Hi, Steve George <[email protected]> skribis:
> I don't think there's any circumstance where we'd have to rip out LLM code > from > the archive. One case is that of copyright infringement where the LLM regurgitated code that is proprietary or published under an incompatible license. >From what I’ve seen (references are in the GCD and in its previous versions), this scenario is not science-fiction. More generally, the legal status of copyright output is still being debated in every jurisdiction, and the fact that many would like to treat it as public domain does not change that. Maybe three years from now copyright will be officially dismantled and we’ll find the discussion we’re having today hilarious. In the meantime, I believe having precautionary measures is understandable, and we’d be in good company in doing so. Ludo’.
