If it failed at openjdk, it hasn't absorbed anything, so I'll revert when I get back home this evening unless someone else does it before me.
Le 28 septembre 2026 11:31:22 GMT+02:00, Andreas Enge <[email protected]> a écrit : >On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 07:08:54AM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: >> I also pushed another one that might be more problematic. It improves >> icedtea and I was still under the impression it didn't have too many >> dependents. Somehow, we managed to increase the number of dependents much >> more than I remembered. We're over 2500! >> Should I revert it and push it to java-team instead? > >Mistakes happen and after a day this has been absorbed by the build >farms, so if everything is okay I would suggest to just keep the commit >on master. There has been a report about openjdk not building, and >indeed right now there is no substitute: > https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/issues/11520 >and the substitute coverage on QA has dropped to 92%, which is >consistent with 2500 missing packages. > >So if indeed there is a problem with the commit, I would recommend >to revert it for now and to serenely look for a solution. > >Andreas >
