On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 11:49:51AM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > If it failed at openjdk, it hasn't absorbed anything, so I'll revert when I > get back home this evening unless someone else does it before me.
My impression is that CI has done icedtea-7, whereas QA has not started it for reasons I do not understand. For the time being, I have reverted the commit compiling icedtea-7 with gcc-14, which brings back the substitute. This does not mean that the commit is actually wrong :) But now we can in all leisure test it in a branch. Andreas
