news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/01/2003 09:18:02 AM: > My experience with the autogenerated gump descriptors is that they > require some by hand cleanup. Try generating a gump descriptor for > jakarta-turbine-fulcrum, and compare it to > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta- > gump/project/jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.xml?rev=1.33&sortby=date
Sam, I've done what looks like a first attempt at mapping the maven project ids to gump projects. Could you please check it out, especially the one's I've marked "not built by gump" and let me know of any others? You can find it here: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-turbine-maven/src/plugins-build/gump/maven2gump.properties?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup With this, the fulcrum descriptor turns out right. Also, is there a naming convention in the gump project names? For Jakarta and xml repositories it appears that the repo is prefixed, but for sourceforge, werken this doesn't appear to be happening. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
