[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BSF looks problematic. Most still use "bsf" for now. Some use "jakarta-bsf". Both are different codebases (renamed packages, for starters).
I've done what looks like a first attempt at mapping the maven project ids to gump projects.
Could you please check it out, especially the one's I've marked "not built by gump" and let me know of any others?
You can find it here:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-turbine-maven/src/plugins-build/gump/maven2gump.properties?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
With this, the fulcrum descriptor turns out right.
servletapi has a related issue due to versioning. To a smaller extent, cactus shares this.
Most of the excalibur "blades" *are* built by gump.
Also, is there a naming convention in the gump project names? For Jakarta and xml repositories it appears that the repo is prefixed, but for sourceforge, werken this doesn't appear to be happening.Gump typically uses the name one uses to check out the source, for example, "jakarta-ant" and "werken". For subprojects, the parent is typically shortened to the last token.
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
