Sam Ruby wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I was thinking about the conceptual idea of having
descriptors for Centipede projects in Gump CVS, and how this would
make things difficult for Centipede projects.
Suggestion: let's just note that it is very easy to move descriptors.
For ASF projects which are not (yet) centipede based, the path of least
resistance seems to be to put them in the gump cvs repository.
Given the current implementation of Centipede, the path of least
resistance for projects which are currently and actively using centipede
is to put such project descriptors in the project cvs.
Moving project descriptors in anticipation of future use seems
counter-productive at this time.
Future versions of gump or centipede (or centigump or gumpipede or
whatever) may change these observations.
[...]
Peace?
:-)
I agree on all the line. Well said. Thank you.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
