> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But there is the other side: does jUDDI relay on gumped projects? > > Granted. I didn't say that I'd roll back a commit that added jUDDI, > just wanted to know the rationale for it. >
Sorry guys, I am reading mail from an odd location w/ no filters and a tonne to wade through. Getting them backwards. Totally understood on why you question it, it is a fair question. And yes -- it depends upon AXIS, commons-logging, WSD4L, and quite a few others. BTW: I really wish we could improve gump to be smarter and (1) only re-build something if something inside it (or below) has changed (2) share pre-built components not duplicate work. The current "brute force" (always download, always build) is accurate, but very intensive. I think checking if something had change in CVS, or in a CVS callign stack, is tricky -- but it might be worth it for gump to be able to grow. [I guess the question becomes, home many things worth gumping are stable -- but at 4 (or more) worldwide gumps a day, I'd say there was likely "stacks" of "stable" code.] regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
