> BTW: I really wish we could improve gump to be smarter and (1) only
        > re-build something if something inside it (or below) has changed

        At least for the "full" Gumps this will be more or less useless as Ant
        changes quite often - and all projects depend on Ant.

Maybe a choice could be to ignore changes for components that are a
"runtime" dependency. Gump isn't meant as an ant script unit test (althogut
that is useful), it is for code integrations. Full gump has more
cycles/time/patience than some of us.

regards

Adam


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to