Ok here are facts.
One the read to end voice could be scripted.  
It is basically saying switch to configured voice when read to end is
pressed.  From what I have seen this could be easily done.  Or you could
have a normal read to end key and a AlterNet read to end key  that  witches
the voice.  Then the script has to check for the read to end to finish and
switch  back to the voice in use before read to end was pressed.  
I am just relearning  vb script you know what they say you don't use it you
lose it? And I have not touched it scence the screen power days.  
Fact 2.  Dectalk is the most stable software speech thus far.  You might not
like how it sounds you might not want to read a book with it witch I have a
number of them but it is the most stable.
Finely you keep adding software speech packages the price of window-eyes
will go up.  
There I hope I put it all in nice perspective.  
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Toews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 8:17 AM
To: erik burggraaf; Mike Pietruk
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: window-eyes and the loquendo voices

This is one of the nice things about having separate say-all
(read-to-end) and standard voices. In a read-to-end situation where
stopping on a dime or immediate interruption is not important, one can
then use a different voice that may be more comfortable to listen to.
Flexibility and configurability are the keys here. I don't want to do my
day-to-day business with one of the so-called higher-quality voices, but
I might prefer to read a novel with one. Then again, I might not. Or I
might actually want to use one of these other voices for day-to-day work
and feel the slower response is an acceptable trade-off in my particular
set of circumstances. The key is choice, choice, choice, and the
realization that opinions are opinions and should be treated as such.
Someone says authoritatively that one thing sounds better than another,
or one proceedure is better than another, then a newer user might
consider that the gospel truth, rather than the opinion it really is,
which is why people in the know must be especially careful to
differentiate fact (1 3 GHz dual-core processor will run faster than an
8088) from opinion (DecTalk is easier to listen to than Eloquence).

Bruce


On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:07:00 -0700, "erik burggraaf"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> People will do this, and I think it's not right, but I can't stop  
> them, smile.  All I can do is advise them, especially in situations  
> where productivity is key, to expose themselves to a little  
> discomferture, and tollerate the best performing voice whether they  
> like it or not.  Since I demonstrably do this myself as a matter of  
> practice, the advice carries a little weight, but in the end that's  
> all it is,.
> 
> Best,
> 
> erik burggraaf
> 
> Certified Technician
> Assistive Computing LTD Support and training
> Sales department: 888-828-2445
> Support and Training: 888-255-5194
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Website coming soon
> 
> 
> 
> On 30-Jun-08, at 7:58 AM, Mike Pietruk wrote:
> 
> > Erik
> >
> > We have 2 issues here:
> >
> > (1)  the voice's performance which can be judged
> >
> > (2)  its sound which is highly personal.
> >
> > The slickest, best performing smoothest voice, if I don't like its  
> > sound,
> > is not the one I will choose to use on an ongoing basis.
> > So, I have to side with Bruce.  It's highly subjective as to what  
> > voice
> > anyone will prefer; and our   preferences may well have no rhyme or  
> > reason
> > other than I "like it."
> >
> >
> > If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> > sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
> > your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> > your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive  
> > it.
> >
> > All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo,  
> > and can be searched through and sorted using the search
> > form at the bottom of the page.
> >
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body
> > of the message.
> >
> 
> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
> your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
> 
> All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and
> can be searched through and sorted using the search
> form at the bottom of the page. 
> 
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
> of the message.
> 
-- 
  Bruce Toews
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can
be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
of the message.

Reply via email to