Hi, Curtis. It is quite a jump. I personally would not want 100 incremental settings, though. Twenty five increments would be gradual enough to me, fifty tops.
Lou N. www.americansolutions.com And sign the petition. -----Original Message----- From: Curtis Delzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 12:24 PM To: Window-Eyes discussion list Subject: about Eloquence Hi there. PLEASE LOOK AT THIS! Everyone who uses Eloquence, do this, go from pitch two to pitch three. There is TOO much disparity between them. Isn't there something that can be done? Between, for example, pitches 2 and 3 is about a major sixth, where between 3 and 4 is about a minor third. Aren't there 99 pitches available in other synthesizers, so why not in the newest one with Window-Eyes? Nine pitches make huge gaps in the most used areas it seems to me. Thanks! Curtis Delzer. HS If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom of the page. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom of the page. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.
