hi, seen this before and I still don't get what having a number there does for you. if you are on a graphic that you have labeled then the label is read and it doesn't say graphic. if the graphic is not labeled it just says graphic and then you need to find out what this graphic does and label it. a number just adds extra verbosity if you ask me.
From: David [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:53 PM To: WE English mailing list Subject: Graphics - Feature missing OK, so we have the 'Name graphics' function, by Ins-G. As I get it, the mouse is automatically moved over the whole window, and when hitting a graphics, checking if it has a label to it; in the software. If it does, this label will be passed on to WE. If it doesn't have a predefined label, the symbol will simply be left untouched, and if you try to manually move your mouse there, WE simply reports 'Graphic'. From there, you always can manually 'label' your graphic. Nice enough. But what do you do, when your screen is spotted with 10, 15, 20 or more graphics? Not very easy to have and keep an overview, which graphics you have already been at, and which you still have to explore. In my old screen reader, there was a feature, for simply numbering all unlabeled graphics. They would then be reported 'Graphic1', 'Graphic2', ... 'Graphic15', 'Graphic16', etc. Really a nice way to do it, as you now could keep track of which numbers you had vissited, and which you still had left. Allright, I know, I could simply move my way around, and start out the whole exploration of the new window, by manually labelling or numbering the graphics in my window. But it is a tidious job, and I really miss the feature of having this done automatically, by a single keystroke. In certain cases, I even found there was no real need for me to further label graphics in certain applications, as you simply just would move your mouse to the 'graphic5', and click that one, not bothering having it further labeled. Guess this would even have been possible by a script of some sort, in WE. So, is there a chance, that this feature could be implemented somehow? _____ I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len> . We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam. SPAMfighter has removed 1425 of my spam emails to date. The Professional version does not have this message. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
