hi,
exactly like I keep saying they are putting in the stuff they need so that they don't have to do it twice. I am starting to wonder why this is such a hard concept.

Jim Grimsby JR.
Skype name: Jim.Grimsby
Skype number:  909-498-4711.
E-mail: [email protected]
Twitter: Jgrimsby

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Chris Tekell" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 12:31 PM
To: "Mike Pietruk" <[email protected]>; "Sandra Fouts" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Cc: "'Robert C'" <[email protected]>; "Nimer Jaber" <[email protected]>; "Chris Hill" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Guess What? - Window-Eyes 7.5 Beta 1 - New User Interface

Or, if one takes the time to read between the lines of all of the statements from GW Micro, the path to 8 was a much larger load of work than anticipated and they went with 7.5 because they decided it was a good halfway point between where we are and where we are going to be with 8. Also, perhaps, just perhaps, the solution to the browse mode problems, something that I too experience and find frustrating, is something that requires some of the other changes? I wonder how well the solution to the problem would work if done with an MSAA framework when MSAA goes away? Just a thought.

I was frustrated to hear about 7.5 and what it wouldn't have since browse mode issues are a big deal to me and especially since I am on my last SMA, but them's the breaks. I would personally rather have a solution that will work for the long term with the current situation and with an eye to the future. GW now has direct contact with Microsoft and has an idea of where things are going with Windows and whether or not they are having to catch up on any particular area or not, I think it is wiser to do things right rather than do them quickly, something that is hard to do in the world of software and that often doesn't leave happy consumers.

Also, on the annual fee versus SMA thing, bad idea. Perhaps as an option for some would be fine, but if one is going through tight times, one then has to come up with the fee to keep up one's software or face falling behind and having to pay whatever catch up fees might be required to buy back in. I doubt it would be feasible to say that someone who has stopped paying for a long period can just start up at the same rate again any more than one can expect to pay the same for jumping from WE 3 to 7.5 that one would pay to jump from 7.2 to 7.5. One faces something similar with SMA, but I just don't care to have yet another annual expense added to what I already have, particularly since there is no way to guarantee that I will get something worth the fee each and every year.

Regards,

Chris

At 10:52 AM 2/2/2011, Mike Pietruk wrote:
Sandra

and perhaps one of the reasons they are labeling it 7.5 rather than 8.0 is
that they don't have a ready fix.
Still, while Robert is technically correct, it hardly is much consolation
to the customer struggling with those issues.




To forgive is the highest, most beautiful form of love.
In return, you will receive untold peace and happiness.
Robert Muller, former United nations Assistant Secretary General
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to