it also depends on your computer. if it is useing the on board or a add on
sound card. the c p u speed etc.
with me it does not make any difference. w e 7.5 is sluggish with all of the
software synthasizers.
7.2 was not.
----- Original Message -----
From: Duyahn Walker
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: window eyes sluggishness and synthesizers
This, of course, is just my opinion. I have used Dectalk with no issues what
so ever. And I use Window eyes 7.5.
Duyahn
----- Original Message -----
From: GEORGE AND PAMELA DOMINGUEZ
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 5:45 PM
Subject: window eyes sluggishness and synthesizers
I had been saying on lists that I had been finding this window eyes to be
extremely sluggish and unresponsive. It takes seconds, sometimes a minute
before it would respond to a key press, making going through documents, etc.
almost unbearable. When somebody posted how to change synthesizers, I decided
I would try it. Especially since it has been fixed so that if you make a
mistake, it won't keep the change unless you tell it to. First, I tried sappy,
and the voice I got was horrible. Next, I decided to change to eloquence, even
though I don't like eloquence. I received the surprise of my life. With
eloquence chosen as the synthesizer, it is like having a whole new computer and
screenreader. It is the most responsive I have ever seen a computer! So, I
was wondering if the people who were going on about how much they loved 7.5
were people who were using eloquence. Further, I was also wondering if the
rest of us who were complaining about the sluggishness were using decktalk.
Which brings me to the third part of my question: why should decktalk be such a
problem if it is something that is already in window eyes? What is wrong with
it? Is there something I have to do to it, or is it something that GW micro has
to do to correct this in subsequent versions? Pam.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 6086 (20110501) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only.
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so
the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
