I bought the new WE around April 10-15, and when I checked for updates a couple of days ago, it said there were none. I think I have the most up-to-date version.
Warm regards, Sahar Husseini For hand-crafted, one-of-a-kind jewelry, please visit my Website at www.saharscreations.com And remember, "Obstacles don't have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don't turn around and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it." Michael Jordan ----- Original Message ----- From: Duyahn Walker To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 3:11 PM Subject: Re: window eyes sluggishness and synthesizers Have you gotten all of the updates for Window eyes? Duyahn ----- Original Message ----- From: Sahar Husseini To: GEORGE AND PAMELA DOMINGUEZ ; [email protected] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 3:09 PM Subject: Re: window eyes sluggishness and synthesizers I am actually experiencing problems with sluggish responses on the Internet, and in Microsoft Word. I use IE8 and Office 2000. I have Windows XP. It's like the new WE needs a ton of memory. I am not sure. My Insert Control S takes a few seconds to respond to read the status line in Word. I don't know what's going on, but it is rather frustrating. I do use Eloquence. Warm regards, Sahar Husseini For hand-crafted, one-of-a-kind jewelry, please visit my Website at www.saharscreations.com And remember, "Obstacles don't have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don't turn around and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it." Michael Jordan ----- Original Message ----- From: GEORGE AND PAMELA DOMINGUEZ To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 5:45 PM Subject: window eyes sluggishness and synthesizers I had been saying on lists that I had been finding this window eyes to be extremely sluggish and unresponsive. It takes seconds, sometimes a minute before it would respond to a key press, making going through documents, etc. almost unbearable. When somebody posted how to change synthesizers, I decided I would try it. Especially since it has been fixed so that if you make a mistake, it won't keep the change unless you tell it to. First, I tried sappy, and the voice I got was horrible. Next, I decided to change to eloquence, even though I don't like eloquence. I received the surprise of my life. With eloquence chosen as the synthesizer, it is like having a whole new computer and screenreader. It is the most responsive I have ever seen a computer! So, I was wondering if the people who were going on about how much they loved 7.5 were people who were using eloquence. Further, I was also wondering if the rest of us who were complaining about the sluggishness were using decktalk. Which brings me to the third part of my question: why should decktalk be such a problem if it is something that is already in window eyes? What is wrong with it? Is there something I have to do to it, or is it something that GW micro has to do to correct this in subsequent versions? Pam. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
