MessageUnfortunately, I have noticed this, too. As others have said, moving too 
quickly between programs may cause problems. Programs load more slowly than 
with 7.2. E-mail messages may open more slowly. Sometimes copying and pasting 
is affected. This is true even after going from 2 to 3 gigs of ram. I am using 
We 7.5 with Windows XP Home SP3.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Edward 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 2:47 PM
  Subject: FW: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


  yes, for example, if you click on my documents and you don't wait until the 
operating system has stopped loading first before you use window eyes, then 
wineyes will crash.  also when outlook is downloading new mail, wineyes will 
become unresponsive.  It's as if wineyes doesn't like any other program using 
the system resources, because anytime the hour glass thing comes up, wineyes 
becomes extremely sluggish or stops working all together. 
  thanks
  Edward

  -----Original Message-----
  From: David [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:17 PM
  To: Edward
  Subject: Re: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


  Slow down to let Window-Eyes catch up with you? Well, then it is not just me! 
And they keep telling us how much more responsive Window-Eyess gets for every 
new release. True, it is more responsive, when it works. But it is also far 
more quick to go hide itself, and think it is bedtimes for old screen readers.

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Edward 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 4:53 PM
    Subject: FW: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


    I agree.  I find myself using jaws more and more on the net these days.  I 
am tired of IE hanging or links not being clickable, edit boxes being sluggish, 
wineyes crashing.  It seems like wineyes doesn't like being used quickly.  
Meaning if you are a quick navigator wineyes struggles to keep up, and when it 
can't, it crashes.  I find myself having to slow down in order to give wineyes 
a chance to catch up with me.

    thanks
    Edward

      


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jacob Schmude [mailto:[email protected]] 
    Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:03 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: A bit of a rant (was Re: Observations with Window Eyes and Web 
Browsing)


    Hi
    ** Warning: Begin a sort of rant **
    Unfortunately, the Firefox issues have been in Window-Eyes for years. 
Essentially, dynamic content causes the entire page to be refreshed. Google's 
edit field causes the page to change as you type in order for it to suggest 
search results, and this triggers window-eyes' page reload behavior. We have 
been promised a fix for this for years and have never gotten it and, while I 
don't know about anyone else, I'm losing my patience with window-eyes on the 
web with Firefox in particular, but with IE as well. Window-Eyes' support for 
Firefox is a joke. Standard elements such as onclicks are not identified (most 
other screen readers call these clickables), image links are not identified as 
links, reviewing edited text doesn't work, the auto completion and history list 
in the address bar do not work properly (they briefly flash in Braille but 
never speak), flash within Firefox is not accessible, mouseOvers and other 
dynamic content do not update the buffer or when they do you are thrown to the 
top, and I could go on. These are things we've been promised fixes for, and 
what do we get? New whiz-bang features with old bugs. Internet Explorer 9 is 
not much better (GW, did you even test IE9 at all?). Dynamic pages with hidden 
elements are not properly rendered (the hidden elements are shown when they 
should not be, have a look at Gmail or Google Voice's pages for that one), 
There are random headings and lists with 0 items inserted everywhere while real 
headings are not identified (blindbargains.com for that last), entering text in 
forms somehow fails to allow all typed characters through (I'm a fast typist). 
Each and every one of these problems I've listed, the free screen reader NVDA 
has overcome (most of these it never exhibited at all). Jaws, that other screen 
reader, isn't far behind and Baum's Cobra doesn't have these troubles either. 
Quite frankly, given the importance of the internet, this is unacceptable and, 
as a Window-Eyes customer for years, I feel more than a little cheated. To GW: 
Don't follow FS down the path of release release release but don't fix. I don't 
care if it takes two years for a new version, as long as that new version of 
Window-Eyes works to the best of your abilities. This is not the best and, if 
you're going to brag about your IE9 support, you'd better make blasted sure it 
works as advertised. The 7.5 release only had one beta cycle. One. Let's look 
at this honestly for a second, no marketing, no pr. What does 7.5 offer over 
7.2 that is worth paying $175 for? A new set file format? Not worth that much. 
A few new scripting functions? Again, not worth that. Cascading settings (a 
nice feature and long overdue, but worth $175?). A rename of scripts to app 
(boy, that must've taken a lot of effort there). Meanwhile, long standing bugs 
go unfixed, and the web is just one area. I could go on but, these days, I'm 
not sure that GW Micro really care. I can't tell off the top of my head exactly 
how much I've put into window-eyes over the years since I've owned it, and I'm 
now using NVDA instead because it's less buggy and actually allows me to get 
real work done. That's just not acceptable QA in my book, and I can't in good 
conscience put my hard-earned cash behind a product with this many problems. I 
apologize for the harshness, but I've reported many of these within the past 
several years and have never seen one fix. Perhaps a little harshness will get 
my point across a bit better. I leave that up to you, GW Micro.

    ** end rant **
    I've never seen the IE8 hanging issue but I'm well familiar with the rest 
of the problems you're having. You're not alone.

    On 6/12/2011 14:58, Cory Martin wrote: 
          Hello, 
          Just wanted to report a couple of issues that I've noticed with 
Window Eyes with web browsing: 

          With Internet Explorer version 8: 
          Firstly there seem to be issues with Google, specifically after doing 
a search, for some reason browse mode doesn't come back on.  It can be enabled 
with the usual command, however it's the only site which doesn't seem to bring 
browse mode back on after entering a search string. 
          More difficult to identify however is a strange issue which seems to 
affect Internet Explorer where when the browser is first opened it just hangs, 
yet opening a second instance of it may work just fine.  I've tried resetting 
it in the advanced tab under internet options, as well as using C-Cleaner to 
remove extra files, as well as clearing personal data.  The issue persists, yet 
with other screen readers it doesn't seem to happen.  This does not seem to be 
a problem with Firefox. 

          With Mozilla Firefox latest version: 
          I switched to Firefox full time after having the unsolvable hanging 
problem with Internet Explorer.  However with Firefox, there seems to be issues 
with staying in forms for entering text.  For example if I'm trying to enter a 
word in to Google it keeps dropping me back in to browse mode every time I 
press the space bar.  I've had to use notepad to type out my search string and 
then paste it in to the browser.  I'm not sure which is more annoying. 

          With either browser: 
          When trying to arrow arrow around in edit boxes on web pages in both 
Internet Explorer or Firefox, Window Eyes just makes a ding sound when trying 
to review text entered.  It is necessary to drop back in to browse mode to 
review what's been entered and then re-enter the edit box and re-position the 
cursor to where one wants to correct something based on best guess, or by 
cutting the text to notepad and editing it there. 

          Does anyone have any experience with these problems to either confirm 
or deny them?  Also and more importantly, does anyone know of work-arounds to 
these issues? 

          Thanks, 
          Cory 
      If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender 
only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is 
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to 
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it. 

      GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can 
manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv. 


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to