Hi Keith, Well, 2010 is the supported version, so problems get fixed; not so much with 2003. The file format in 2003 is binary and subject to corruption very easily. The 2010 file format is xml-based, and even if damaged you can still load your document usually. I think WE works better with 2003, and 2003 is easier to use, but what can you do: it's not being supported, and so you could run into problems of all kinds continuing to use it; I think we've got no real choice but to move on and wait for MS and GW to make it possible for our screen readers to deal with it. I'm sure there are new features in Office 2010 which are worth-while (I don't know the differences well enough to say), but the document file format stability really is an important one. At my work place we're running both right now, and we do see instances of 2010 being able to load a file which 2003 can't. hth, Chip
_____ From: Keith S. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 12:35 PM To: gw info Subject: Perks of Office 2010 over 2003? What perks, are there, if any, of Office 2010 versus Office 2003? Just curious. How is the WE response / usability of 2010 over 2003? Thanks \ Keith Reach me at: Email: [email protected] Skype: keith.steinbach1 If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
