What errors do you speak about on my last post? I found several
mistakes in your own mistakes but does it make it true? I really am
annoyed with your arrogance and apathy towards the bulk of the working
aged blind that is 70% unemployed. Let me guess that is mostly
initiative like your sub-conscience ordinal list illustrrates that are
all not true nor in the correct order either.

    You are comparing apples and oranges and apparetly never had any
logics class in college either. You are comparing federal employment
of which I posted t your measely state government? You have worked in
21 years.5 that isn't the same technology nor is the economics even
remotely the same nor the technology. I guess blame the majority like
you other supposed blind professional elitist always do. I hope that
you conservatives do get what you want cut everything just cut the
medicaid, medicare, food stamps and cut everything till we beg for
everything on the street. Blame us for freakin everything like a
typical conservative feces that you are. I'm leaving this list and
shouldn't have come back cause GW-Micro doesn't give a God damn about
the poor nor upward mobility nor anything. All you care about is your
own damned evil money and you can shove it up your arse for all I
care. In the end of the day, God will make what is right is right and
this is wrong how you demonize the rest of us for your own fortune. If
anybody wants to talk to me unlike the neglectful Aaron or Doug Geofry
then you can E-mail me at [email protected] or if not bye.


adios,
Peter

On 2/5/13, Karyn Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Excuse me but I've seen mistakes in other posts but chose not to comment
> and
> this one is no exception.
>
> Second of all, I don't work for the feds.  I work at a small state agency.
> I use WE with applications such as Microsoft Word, Microsoft XL and
> Microsoft Outlook as well as Internet explorer.  I also use some Adobe
> acrobat for reading PDF documents that are not scanned images.
>
> Don't attack as I've held my job for 21.5 years,something hopefully you can
> one day say.
>
> Yes, there is a problem and there are a variety of reasons for that
> problem.
> Some of it goes to client initiative, some of it goes to employer attitudes
> and some of it goes to economic conditions.  It goes far beyond the choice
> of screan readers and would be a good discussion on other lists more suited
> to that purpose.
>
> Karyn Campbell, Illinois USA, [email protected]
> Using WE 8.0  on Toshiba laptop running Windows 7 home premium 32-bit with
> Office 2007 and IE 8 as well as Acer netbook running Windows 7  home
> premium
> 64-bit with Office 2007 and IE 9 and Microsoft Security Essentials on both
> machines.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Wolfe [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:46 PM
> To: Karyn Campbell
> Cc: gw-info
> Subject: Re: Off topic - U.S Federal Workers using Window-Eyes?
>
> Caren,
>
>
>     Oh, I'm surprised that you diddn't find any other typos in my other
> numerous posts on this and other related posts that I've done on this
> thread
> just amazing! You have to justify your point by outright lambasting me
> cause
> you are lucky to have gotten a job with the federal government. You use
> your
> anecdote not imperically researched or no context, yet criticize for
> something on an informal forum like an E-mail list? I almost want to laugh
> right now on the pathetic mud slinging that you and other feds have on the
> truth not the lies that there is an unemployment problem with the blind and
> a problem with the federal government in particular with it.
>
>     I don't really care what you have to say cause you added nothing to the
> conversation like at all. You wouldn't provide even basic information to go
> off of when, job title,, applications at work and other pertenant
> information. Its almost a joke of a post cause its purely symbolic with no
> substance at all to it. Maybe next time Caren or others tell me real facts
> not data bytes. By the way, I'm applying and will eventually get a job with
> the feds even without help.
>
>
> sincerely,
> Peter Q Wolfe, BA
>
>
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to