Dave, As QT 5 is a constantly evolving entity, there are likely new items to which we need to adapt. The QT Support app will not be useful in this case as it addresses issues with version 4.6 and 4.7 of said framework. We will take a look to see what will be needed.
Steve -- Stephen Clower Window-Eyes Product Support and App Development Ai Squared 725 Airport North Office Park Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (802) 362-3612 www.aisquared.com<http://www.aisquared.com> Sent from my phone. On Oct 14, 2014, at 1:52 AM, "Dave Bahr" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It's the qt framework because of how window-eyes reads the buttons, and the previous versions acted like a qt app does when it's not accessible. Also, if you have a custom control and you try to reclass it, it just tells you it's a qt widget. Aside from widget being a very peculiar word in the vernacular, that info doesn't help anyone at all, so there's not a good way to reclass a cc. I'm not having a lot of luck either. Mbam isn't reading me what it wants to fix, I just see two buttons that say, enter, and another that says, fix now, enter. Ok, but what am I fixing? About qt again, I helped a bit with getting widnow-eyes to read qt 5-based applications, but, like the java support, it's got a long way to go before it's fully accessible. Let me look at the qt support app a bit, not sure how relevant it would be. Anyone from gwmicro want to chime in here? I'm not sure if any of that was helpful at all. Thanks, Dave On 10/13/2014 7:24 PM, Rod hutton wrote: Hi Dave, I’m not having much luck with this new release at all. I listened to Michael Capelle’s tutorial (only 15 minutes long), and it certainly looks as though JFW has this version’s accessibility nailed. It’s actually quite disappointing that WE doesn’t seem to be able to work with it. Incidentally, how did you know it was using the QT framework? I installed the QT support app, and it certainly helped in identifying the state of the checkboxes, but the extraneous reading of a number counting up drove me crazy. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks, Rod From: Dave Bahr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 3:32 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Malwarebytes 2.3 It seems to work here fine. For the record it's 2.0.3 so as not to be confused with 2.3. It looks sort of accessible from the interface that I've seen, definitely an improvement over what it was. The thing is that they are still using the QT framework which is always a bit buggy with Window-Eyes. I'm hoping that Window-Eyes nine will have better support for QT. On 10/13/2014 12:35 PM, Sam Bushman wrote: I just chose update from the software and it downloaded and installed 2.2.2... Sam From: Chris Grabowski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 12:34 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Malwarebytes 2.3 I haven’t tested it, but, RT @Malwarebytes : The new Malwarebytes Anti-Malware 2.0.3 includes screenreader compatibility and more. Download it at http://www.malwarebytes.org Chris Window-Eyes Product Support Ai Squared 725 Airport North Office Park Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (802) 362-3612 www.aisquared.com<http://www.aisquared.com/> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
