But that's where I got stuck, couldn't figure out what exclusions were there.
On 10/14/2014 10:12 AM, Chris Grabowski wrote:

It has an interesting interface.

Tab and shift-tab seem to read just fine for me under windows 8.1.

|You need to use a combination of arrow keys as well, for example to get to settings.

1. Open malware bytes.

2.Tab to the dashboard button.

3.Right arrow to the settings button

4.Tab off of settings.

5.You can now press up and down arrow between general malware exclusions, web exclusions etc.

6.Press tab once you get to the category you want to deal with.

Window-Eyes Product Support

Ai Squared

725 Airport North Office Park

Fort Wayne, IN 46825

(802) 362-3612

www.aisquared.com <http://www.aisquared.com/>

*From:*Dave Bahr [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2014 11:34 AM
*To:* Rod hutton; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: Malware Bytes 2.03 update Was RE: Malwarebytes 2.3

I couldn't get nvda to read me jack from malwarebytes 2.0.3. But honestly, I'm not that great at nvda, that whole idea of objects and containers and stuff.

On 10/14/2014 9:19 AM, Rod hutton wrote:

    Hi Dave,

    Yes, Duyahn is perfectly right.

    Even Malware Bytes techies say that the engine is the same
    regardless of the version you use.

    From Michael Capelle's tutorial, it doesn't seem the engine of
    Malware Bytes has changed significantly.

    Besides, some protection is better than none.

    Apparently, though, NVDA does quite well with version 2.03.

    Take your pick, I guess. Smile

    Good luck,

    Rod

    *From:*Dave Bahr [mailto:[email protected]]
    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:08 AM
    *To:* Rod hutton; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: Malware Bytes 2.03 update Was RE: Malwarebytes 2.3

    Yep, back I went this morning to 1.75 as well. But the question
    is, if I were to buy the pro version, I could still use 1.75 and
    use realtime malware protection, right? I mean, as long as they
    get their money, does it really matter if I use an older version?
    For the new version,I think all they would have to do is make some
    sort of list box or even a separate output field to show what
    items are there and whether an action has been or needs to be
    taken on them.

    On 10/14/2014 8:02 AM, Rod hutton wrote:

        Hi Dave,

        Thanks for the feedback.

        I'll go back to 1.75 for now.

        Keep on plugging,

        Rod

        *From:*Dave Bahr [mailto:[email protected]]
        *Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2014 1:47 AM
        *To:* Rod hutton; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: Malware Bytes 2.03 update Was RE: Malwarebytes 2.3

        It's the qt framework because of how window-eyes reads the
        buttons, and the previous versions acted like a qt app does
        when it's not accessible. Also, if you have a custom control
        and you try to reclass it, it just tells you it's a qt widget.
        Aside from widget being a very peculiar word in the
        vernacular, that info doesn't help anyone at all, so there's
        not a good way to reclass a cc.
        I'm not having a lot of luck either. Mbam isn't reading me
        what it wants to fix, I just see two buttons that say, enter,
        and another that says, fix now, enter. Ok, but what am I fixing?
        About qt again, I helped a bit with getting widnow-eyes to
        read qt 5-based applications, but, like the java support, it's
        got a long way to go before it's fully accessible. Let me look
        at the qt support app a bit, not sure how relevant it would
        be. Anyone from gwmicro want to chime in here?

        I'm not sure if any of that was helpful at all.
        Thanks, Dave

        On 10/13/2014 7:24 PM, Rod hutton wrote:

            Hi Dave,

            I'm not having much luck with this new release at all.

            I listened to Michael Capelle's tutorial (only 15 minutes
            long), and it certainly looks as though JFW has this
            version's accessibility nailed.

            It's actually quite disappointing that WE doesn't seem to
            be able to work with it.

            Incidentally, how did you know it was using the QT framework?

            I installed the QT support app, and it certainly helped in
            identifying the state of the checkboxes, but the
            extraneous reading of a number counting up drove me crazy.

            Do you have any suggestions?

            Thanks,

            Rod

            *From:*Dave Bahr [mailto:[email protected]]
            *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2014 3:32 PM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: Malwarebytes 2.3

            It seems to work here fine. For the record it's 2.0.3 so
            as not to be confused with 2.3. It looks sort of
            accessible from the interface that I've seen, definitely
            an improvement over what it was. The thing is that they
            are still using the QT framework which is always a bit
            buggy with Window-Eyes. I'm hoping that Window-Eyes nine
            will have better support for QT.

            On 10/13/2014 12:35 PM, Sam Bushman wrote:

                I just chose update from the software and it
                downloaded and installed 2.2.2..

                Sam

                *From:* Chris Grabowski [mailto:[email protected]]
                *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2014 12:34 PM
                *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Malwarebytes 2.3

                I haven't tested it, but,

                RT @Malwarebytes : The new Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
                2.0.3 includes screenreader compatibility and more.
                Download it at http://www.malwarebytes.org

                Chris

                Window-Eyes Product Support

                Ai Squared

                725 Airport North Office Park

                Fort Wayne, IN 46825

                (802) 362-3612 <callto:8023623612>

                www.aisquared.com <http://www.aisquared.com/>



If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to