I've only been using we for a little over 8 months now, but i have to agree
about the physical mouse issue being able to use the physical mouse was one
of the main reasons i chose to use we and i was disapointed that in the
beta for we9 this  was not fixed. I understand microsoft makes changes
y'all can't control but as a low vision user switching between we,zoomtext
and nvda is getting a little frustrating just to use the physical mouse

Reeva

On Tuesday, January 27, 2015, tchild <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, I don't call a newer version that works less well and upgrade myself.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Loy
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 7:51 AM
> To: gw-info
> Subject: Re: Ai Squared's lack of response
>
> I have been a long time user and supporter of Window Eyes since version
> 4.11. It has been the best out there. However I have to agree on this
> particular issue. We once had this functionality of the mouse keys and the
> physical mouse to read the screen and now after paying for version 8 and 9
> these functions have disappear. I know that changes made by Microsoft has
> caused some of these problems, but there should be a way to bring this
> back. We should not loose a feature in newer upgrades.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon Miller" <
> [email protected]>
> To: "GW Micro Product Discussion Listserv" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:44 AM
> Subject: Ai Squared's lack of response
>
>
>  Hello, Ai Squared? Ai Squared? Hellooooo, is there anybody out there? I
>> am really starting to wonder! Can you blame me? Before you answer hastily,
>> here me out. I recently asked for someone, anyone, fworking either as a
>> direct employee of, or someone working with, Ai Squared to weigh in so to
>> speak, to provide us, your so called customers, with some feedback as to
>> why exactly the mouse keys don't work right anymore, and we're all expected
>> to revert to using versions of software that are in the case of Mozilla
>> Firefox, five, actually more than five, versions old just to regain that
>> small bit of functionality. Ai Squared, you say nothing? Isn't that the
>> case guys? Did I just miss it? Or did Ai Squared really not address any of
>> the questions I asked? Ai Squared, I ask you, how am I, and most if not all
>> of us by extention, supposed to feel about that? I'd like for you to know
>> Mr. Brendon Donohue that I for one agree with a lot of the sentiments that
>> you, and precious few others have been expressing to Ai Squared recently. I
>> feel like those of us who are blind, although several of us on this list at
>> least are calling for change and improvement, are nevertheless being left
>> out in the cold! I feel like our suggestions and requests, no matter how
>> thoughtfully or cordially offered, are falling on nothing but deff ears!
>> Why is that Ai Squared? Why is that? Are you going to again say nothing?
>> Here's hoping not, and I do apologise for the charged tone of this letter
>> 'cause I'm sure you're not enjoying reading it, but Ai Squared, how am I
>> supposed to feel? I know that y'all have recently completely re-written
>> browse mode, and I'm sure that was quite an undertaking. No doubt about it.
>> The thing is though, we, as your customers, are writing you, quite often it
>> seems, with complaints. With things that need to at a minimum, be at least
>> acknowledged and addressed publically, so that we as your customers can
>> feel confident that you are listening to us! That you are in fact, actually
>> taking the time to read our emails! That you are doing what you have been
>> given money to do. Namely, to manufactur and develop, and I quote from your
>> user manual, "Window-eyes: Performance, Reliability, and Stability". Just
>> so y'all know, for any who may not in other words, the latest stable public
>> release of Firefox is 35.0.1. Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Respectfully submitted,
>>
>> Brandon Dean Miller
>> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
>> only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
>> related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
>> [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>>
>> GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
>> manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
>>
>>  "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that
> the
> world through Him might be saved." John 3:17
>
> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
> only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
> related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
> [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>
> GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
> manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
> only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
> related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
> [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>
> GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
> manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
>
>

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to