Hi Joseph and All,
 
Joseph, I do agree with you that BS and VS users need to keep a clear
perspective on what these devices are and are not.  They are a PDA, not
a laptop or desktop computer.  They are meant to be used on the go.
Think of it as your travel suitcase for information.  You can't fit
everything in there, just as you can't fit your entire wardrobe and
other items in your suitcase when you travel.  
 
Yes, I am well aware that for some people they just can't afford a note
taker and a computer or laptop along with the screen reading software.
This is why it is important to assess all of your needs before buying
any product.  If you have a need to create seriously formatted
documents, or manage complex databases, then a note taker might not be
what you need at that time.  For about the same money you can spend on a
note taker, you can buy a netbook and screen reading software.
 
I am not trying to convince people that the BS and VS are not worth
while devices.  I love my VS for what it is, and have recommended it to
many other people.  However, I have recommended other devices after
assessing a person's needs.
 
Keep in mind that the more features that get packed into a device will
raise the price.
 
Annette
 

________________________________

From: Joseph Lee [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [GWN] Braille Sense and its limits



Hi folks,

Nice to see a steady flow of suggestions about Braille sense. Some of
them included foreign language support, word count and so forth.
Although they were good ones, one needs to consider if it is worth it to
put it on a device that has technical limits. Not that I am saying that
BS family has outward limits, but in terms of specs and OS, it does have
limits.

First, as mike said, Braille Sense  is a PDA. In other words, Braille
Sense is meant to be PC companion, not a PC replacement (although I've
seen some people mistaken it for such). In other words, not all things
that can be done on a computer cannot be done under Braille Sense. For
instance, not all websites that a Windows XP machine can handle cannot
be navigated using Braille Sense.

On the hardware side, the line between PC and PDA is becoming less
differentiated - at least when BS is concerned. Braille Sense has one of
the good processors for mobile devices, as well as sufficient memory to
run applications and store useful data. But in terms of software side,
it is not. Braille Sense runs under Windows CE - not regular Wihndows,
folks. Windows CE is a completely different OS architecture than Windows
NT family. Thus, it has limits, such as 32 MB of virtual memory and 32
process limit (this is the reason why BS would only allow seven programs
maximum). As for virtual memory, I need solid evidence of things such as
browser crashing or other slow downs before explaining what exactly it
is and its limits (if demands requires me to, but right now I am going
through summer school in college).

Also, as I have stressed on another list, writing code for embedded
devices such as Braille Sense carries different requirements. One needs
to be careful about memory usage, processor architecture and so forth.
Just because we imagine things in our heads and pray that it will appear
out of nowhere does not mean that it will happen soon - one needs to
plan, compose, debug, recompile and release the software (if stable
enough) numerous times before a suggestion or feature request will work
properly.

Also, it seems that the manual is wrong about type of USB port. Braille
Sense does NOT have USB OTG (On-the-go) technology at all. All it has
are one USB host and one USB client, that's all. If it had OTG port,
theoretically Braille Sense can work with two USB client devices at once
- one on BS's own uSB host port, another one on the USB client port with
a dedicated adapter.

As to what USB OTG standard is, I'll compose the article in question
when there is enough demand. For those who have seen me on other lists,
you would know what OTG is and my article style...

Cheers,

Joseph P.S. Alex, do you agree with me on this one?

Reply via email to