Hi J J,

I prefer the older sounds. They were no good for laptops, but I liked them
for the desktop. Any way we can get them back other than downgrading?  I
think we should be able to choose the ascending sounds, between those two.
These now are too loud and harsh for a desktop or headphones situation.

All the best

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: J.J. Meddaugh [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday 14 November 2009 20:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script

I'm open to ideas. Agreed those aren't the greatest sounds either. Ideally 
there would be a tone generator function in VBScript but alas there isn't.

J.J. Meddaugh - ATGuys.com
A premier Licensed Code Factory and KNFB Reader distributor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Curtis Delzer" <[email protected]>
To: "Steve Pattison" <[email protected]>; "GW Info" <[email protected]>
Cc: "the gw-micro scripting list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script


>I believe the reasons for the sounds are percentages of one. The other 
>sounds, the whole tone scale as it was, I think only 20 rather than 100 
>sounds? Guessing but that is a default of 5 percentage. I don't like that 
>"raspy" sound either, which actually are square waves as opposed to sine 
>waves, and seems to me that they are the same as the NVDA sounds which 
>indicate progress bars. The problem with 100 sounds, is the range of most 
>speaker systems on computers, and maintaining some kind of musical context 
>as in the earlier sounds. I'll see if I can work out something, because it 
>would be fun to hear musical sounds as opposed to this rasp. :)
>
>
> Curtis Delzer.
> HS.
> sounds. Problem,
>
> At Thursday 11/12/2009 03:40 AM, Steve Pattison wrote:
>>First of all I appreciate the hard work people who write scripts do to
>>provide so many useful scripts for people like me who don't have the
>>slightest clue how to write scripts or any other type of program.
>>
>>However I am very disappointed with the new sounds in the latest version
>>of the Progress Indicator script.  I find the new sounds very harsh and
>>bordering on being annoying.  However I appreciate other people prefer
>>these sounds and I understand why GW Micro feel the new sounds are
>>better for people using laptops etc.
>>
>>I have a suggestion that could possibly please everyone.  Why not create
>>another script with the original sounds and call it something like
>>Progress Indicator Classic or similar and make it identical to the new
>>Progress Indicator script except for the sounds.  Then you could include
>>the edition of the script with the new sounds as the default script with
>>Window-eyes and also on Script Central and as well make another edition
>>of the script available on Script Central with the sounds that wer used
>>previously with this script.
>>
>>Regards Steve
>>Email:  [email protected]
>>MSN Messenger:  [email protected]
>>Skype:  steve1963
>>Twitter:  steve9782
>>
>>If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
>>sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
>>your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
>>your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>>
>>All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and 
>>can be searched through and sorted using the search
>>form at the bottom of the page.
>>
>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
>>[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body
>>of the message.
>
> 



Reply via email to