Hi,

The only difficult situation for the others for me was laptop speakers, but
I did prefer them overall.  I think a piano might do it.

All the best

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: J.J. Meddaugh [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday 15 November 2009 21:03
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script

The others were too muted to me. But there's probably a middle ground.
There's also a difference in headphones vs. speakers vs. laptop speakers.

J.J. Meddaugh - ATGuys.com
A premier Licensed Code Factory and KNFB Reader distributor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Nutt" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 2:47 PM
Subject: RE: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script


> Hi JJ,
>
> Sorry, but you must admit, they are loud and horrid sounds <Smile>.
>
> All the best
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J.J. Meddaugh [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday 15 November 2009 18:37
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script
>
> Wow. Guess I should have never touched the old sounds, grin.
> I'll see what I can do.
>
> J.J. Meddaugh - ATGuys.com
> A premier Licensed Code Factory and KNFB Reader distributor
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Nutt" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 1:16 PM
> Subject: RE: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script
>
>
>> Hi Curtis,
>>
>> Could you send the wavs to me please?  Don't like these horrible noises.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Curtis Delzer [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Sunday 15 November 2009 17:29
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script
>>
>> I do have them now.
>>
>>
>> Curtis Delzer.
>> HS.
>>
>>
>> on Sunday 11/15/2009 02:49 AM, Steve Nutt said:
>>>I would go back to the original sounds, but since updating I don't know
>> what
>>>the original wav files were that were used.  Anyone have them?
>>>
>>>All the best
>>>
>>>Steve
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Life My Way [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>Sent: Sunday 15 November 2009 02:50
>>>To: [email protected]
>>>Subject: Re: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script
>>>
>>>why not use a real panio to make the notes or  go back to the orginal
>>>sounds?
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Steve Nutt" <[email protected]>
>>>To: <[email protected]>
>>>Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:51 PM
>>>Subject: RE: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi J J,
>>>
>>>I prefer the older sounds. They were no good for laptops, but I liked 
>>>them
>>>for the desktop. Any way we can get them back other than downgrading?  I
>>>think we should be able to choose the ascending sounds, between those 
>>>two.
>>>These now are too loud and harsh for a desktop or headphones situation.
>>>
>>>All the best
>>>
>>>Steve
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: J.J. Meddaugh [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>Sent: Saturday 14 November 2009 20:41
>>>To: [email protected]
>>>Subject: Re: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script
>>>
>>>I'm open to ideas. Agreed those aren't the greatest sounds either. 
>>>Ideally
>>>there would be a tone generator function in VBScript but alas there 
>>>isn't.
>>>
>>>J.J. Meddaugh - ATGuys.com
>>>A premier Licensed Code Factory and KNFB Reader distributor
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Curtis Delzer" <[email protected]>
>>>To: "Steve Pattison" <[email protected]>; "GW Info"
>> <[email protected]>
>>>Cc: "the gw-micro scripting list" <[email protected]>
>>>Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:59 PM
>>>Subject: Re: Feedback about the Latest Progress Indicator Script
>>>
>>>
>>> >I believe the reasons for the sounds are percentages of one. The other
>>> >sounds, the whole tone scale as it was, I think only 20 rather than 100
>>> >sounds? Guessing but that is a default of 5 percentage. I don't like
>>> >that
>>> >"raspy" sound either, which actually are square waves as opposed to 
>>> >sine
>>> >waves, and seems to me that they are the same as the NVDA sounds which
>>> >indicate progress bars. The problem with 100 sounds, is the range of
>>> >most
>>> >speaker systems on computers, and maintaining some kind of musical
>> context
>>> >as in the earlier sounds. I'll see if I can work out something, because
>> it
>>> >would be fun to hear musical sounds as opposed to this rasp. :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Curtis Delzer.
>>> > HS.
>>> > sounds. Problem,
>>> >
>>> > At Thursday 11/12/2009 03:40 AM, Steve Pattison wrote:
>>> >>First of all I appreciate the hard work people who write scripts do to
>>> >>provide so many useful scripts for people like me who don't have the
>>> >>slightest clue how to write scripts or any other type of program.
>>> >>
>>> >>However I am very disappointed with the new sounds in the latest
>>> >>version
>>> >>of the Progress Indicator script.  I find the new sounds very harsh 
>>> >>and
>>> >>bordering on being annoying.  However I appreciate other people prefer
>>> >>these sounds and I understand why GW Micro feel the new sounds are
>>> >>better for people using laptops etc.
>>> >>
>>> >>I have a suggestion that could possibly please everyone.  Why not
>>> >>create
>>> >>another script with the original sounds and call it something like
>>> >>Progress Indicator Classic or similar and make it identical to the new
>>> >>Progress Indicator script except for the sounds.  Then you could
>>> >>include
>>> >>the edition of the script with the new sounds as the default script
>>> >>with
>>> >>Window-eyes and also on Script Central and as well make another 
>>> >>edition
>>> >>of the script available on Script Central with the sounds that wer 
>>> >>used
>>> >>previously with this script.
>>> >>
>>> >>Regards Steve
>>> >>Email:  [email protected]
>>> >>MSN Messenger:  [email protected]
>>> >>Skype:  steve1963
>>> >>Twitter:  steve9782
>>> >>
>>> >>If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
>>> >>sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
>>> >>your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
>>> >>your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive 
>>> >>it.
>>> >>
>>> >>All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, 
>>> >>and
>>> >>can be searched through and sorted using the search
>>> >>form at the bottom of the page.
>>> >>
>>> >>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
>>> >>[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body
>>> >>of the message.
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 



Reply via email to