Then let me clarify: The only thing that I changed was small letters to capitals.
Why should this make any difference? Jeff From: Aaron Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: re-naming script packages You answered your own question. <grin> The name of your package is stored internally in the package information, so if you rename it, the package no longer matches. Aaron On 10/26/2010 12:03 PM, Jeff Weiss wrote: I would like to ask Aaron and others if there is any reason not to rename script packages? As you know, when you download a script package, at least with Jamal's script, the package name is all in small letters. I often rename my script packages, starting each word with a capital so that it sounds better. Is there a reason not to do this? The reason I ask, when I went to update my TextToClip package, it would not update the version number correctly. Even though I entered 1.4 in the script package, and I had 1.4 in the xml file, it kept showing 1.3. I ended up deleting the package, and creating en entirely new package and now all of the info is correct. I just don't understand why I couldn't update a package which had been renamed by me. Any suggestions or explanations would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeff Weiss -- Aaron Smith Product Support Specialist * Web Development GW Micro, Inc. * 725 Airport North Office Park, Fort Wayne, IN 46825 260-489-3671 * gwmicro.com To insure that you receive proper support, please include all past correspondence (where applicable), and any relevant information pertinent to your situation when submitting a problem report to the GW Micro Technical Support Team.
