Just the .wepm file, and the only thing I changed was making the first
letter of each word a capital.
 When downloading a package from script central, the package name,
including capitalization seems to stay the same;
However, when downloading with the install packages script, all of the
letters seem to be changed to small letters.
This seems to make no difference to the end user, but when I went to
update a package, I used one which had been downloaded with the install
packages script, and I was unable to update the package.
I finally deleted the package, and created a new one which was
successful.
So, I just need to take a little more care to keep my original packages
separate from packages that I download with install packages.
Jeff Weiss



-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Orange [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 7:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: re-naming script packages

 
Jeff,
what exactly are you renaming?  is it just the .wepm file, or are you
renaming the
.vbs file, or perhaps the entry in the wineyes.ini file?  what's being
changed?
(it's my thought that changing the case of the .wepm file has no effect,
but
almost
anything else does have one).
Chip


________________________________

From: Jeff Weiss [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: re-naming script packages



I would like to ask Aaron and others if there is any reason not to
rename
script packages?

As you know, when you download a script package, at least with Jamal's
script, the package name is all in small letters.

I often rename my script packages, starting each word with a capital so
that
it sounds better.  

Is there a reason not to do this?

The reason I ask, when I went to update my TextToClip package, it would
not
update the version number correctly.  Even though I entered 1.4 in the
script package, and I had 1.4 in the xml file, it kept showing 1.3.

I ended up deleting the package, and creating en entirely new package
and
now all of the info is correct.

I just don't understand why I couldn't update a package which had been
renamed by me.

 

Any suggestions or explanations would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Jeff Weiss

 

 


Reply via email to