Hi!

    In my confusing response earlier I do agree in what chip said, menu's 
instead of...

    For if you design a menu which incorporates the help menu, then why just 
have a help menu that installs both.
    but, as I had said before, having that first menu with an option and a help 
does reduce need to jumped to but instead click on, a button instead a menu 
item.

    Now having said that, a menu does offer, "MORE OPTIONS" then the speedy 
help menu.

    so, what Chip says does have some validity in be asked.

    Update on my Cuckoo Clock: I tested the menu to selection to dialog to 
combo box and it works. This is for selecting time values instead entering in 
an edit field.
    Doing things one step at a time to learn as well as Chip said, to make it 
look good and easy for a user.

        Bruce

  Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 8:55 PM
  Subject: RE: a "best practices" question


  Doug,

  My Bad, in posing the question in the way I did.  I didn't mean to focus on 
the "help and options" button, and I did just call it the "help" button.

  I was only trying to ask if people thought a menu only interface was 
friendlier than a dialog one for options (since we have this nice app menu 
now).  In trying to say why I thought it might be, in somehow turned into 
unintended criticism of the "help and options" button.

  thanks.

  Chip






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Doug Geoffray [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:55 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: a "best practices" question


  Nobody but Aaron has acknowledged that the button in the App Manager dialog 
is called "Help and Options".  Everyone else seems to think this is just called 
"Help".  As Aaron mentioned, this was called this because when 7.0 first came 
out this was the only way for a user to get help or options without knowing a 
specific hotkey an app may or may not provide. 

  We later realized that having all users go to the App Manager dialog for help 
and / or options was not a good approach.  It was far to complicated for most 
users.  This is exactly why we now have the Apps menu option right off the main 
Window-Eyes menu bar.  This is far easier for a user.  Than it is up to the app 
author as to what they put in their entry under the apps menu.  GW Micro has 
standardized on creating a sub menu with at least a help option and if 
necessary an options entry and/or anything else relevant to that app.  Take a 
look at the factory GW Micro apps in the Apps menu.

  We left the Help and Options button in the App Manager for backwards 
compatibility but do not (and I stress do not) believe this is or should be 
expected to be the main interface into your app for help or options.  The apps 
menu should be the first place any new user to an app should be going.  The App 
Manager really is a more advanced dialog that beginning users should have no 
need to go into.  The Help and Options button is just grandfathered in.

  Doug

  On 5/24/2011 7:47 AM, Chip Orange wrote: 
    Yes, and I think Aaron was proposing mostly the same solution (except for 
the help in app manager going directly into a preferences dialog).

    Yes, nothing says I have to, but I think it's better for our users if we 
present them with a consistent interface from one app to the next, as far as 
it's possible.  and of course, I wanted to hear other opinions, so thanks for 
yours.

    I think I will change my ways, and if it's more than a single menu choice, 
I think I'll add a choice for "preferences" to go to a dialog; like you though, 
I don't care for help in app manager not going directly to help, so I'll leave 
that as standard help dialog.

    Chip




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: J.J. Meddaugh [mailto:[email protected]] 
    Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:28 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: a "best practices" question


    Chip,
    Also, just because GW does it a certain way doesn't mean it's the only 
option. I would likely have a preferences option under Edit or Tools in my menu 
structure to handle things like this. I can still link the dialog to the WE 
menus plus have it available from my app where I'd expect it. If I'm in a 
mainstream app, I look for options or preferences under tools, edit, file, etc. 
I wouldn't think to look under help.

    Best Regards,
    J.J. Meddaugh
    A T Guys
    Your Assistive Technology Experts
    (269) 216-4798
    http://www.ATGuys.com
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Chip Orange 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 8:48 PM
      Subject: RE: a "best practices" question


      Hi Aaron,

      I will, in order to be consistent, do it as you suggest if that seems to 
be the overall opinion.

      However, I find dialogs of controls (especially large ones) more 
confusing than menus usually, and harder to go into and make a change to one 
setting than to do that in a set of menus, where it's easier to find the 
particular item you seek.

      However, Vic points out it's harder to change many settings at once.

      I also don't like going into a dialog via a "help" choice, only to have 
to choose another "help" button to get to the help.  I wish here the standard 
help dialog gave us an option to add an "options" button which would lead to 
the configuration dialog.

      Also, I do this just because I start out with a menu with a couple of 
options to turn on/off, and then I keep adding to it until it turns into menus 
2 or 3 levels deep with a dozen options.

      But if I'm to redesign things, I wanted to do it in a consistent way, and 
a way most people found the easiest to use.

      thanks.

      Chip




--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      From: Aaron Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
      Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:24 AM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: Re: a "best practices" question


      On 5/21/2011 6:13 PM, Chip Orange wrote: 
Now, I find myself usually designing my app interfaces so that all
configuration options are controlled via the app menu entry (and it's
submenus), so I can leave the help dialog managed as a standard help dialog
by the help dialog object.
      Why not have one dialog that provides configuration options, along with a 
help button that will launch the standard help dialog? That dialog will then 
get called regardless of whether the user select the Help and Options button, 
or the configuration option in the app's menu entry. The Progress Indicator 
script demonstrates how this should be done.

      Aaron


-- 
Aaron Smith 
Web Development * App Development * Product Support Specialist
GW Micro, Inc. * 725 Airport North Office Park, Fort Wayne, IN 46825
260-489-3671 * gwmicro.com

To insure that you receive proper support, please include all past
correspondence (where applicable), and any relevant information
pertinent to your situation when submitting a problem report to the GW
Micro Technical Support Team.

Reply via email to