That's not what issue 149 is about. I understand replacing tokens
just fine, but that is not what this thread is discussing.
On Nov 12, 2:53 pm, "Brian Cribbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where could I upload my sample? All you've got to do is have Maven filter a
> properties file then try to load it with
> this.getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("foo.properties") and
> print out the properties in it. They'll be the EL tokens instead of what
> should be in there.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Charlie Collins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's not in the trunk yet, no. I do think it will get applied to a
> > future release, but exactly when I can't say.
>
> > I was actually waiting on what the last comment says " I will check
> > that sample and see if I can adjust it or create a new
> > sample." I would like to see a small sample that demonstrates this so
> > I can understand it better, and so we have a reference to check
> > changes against going forward.
>
> > On Nov 12, 5:40 am, Raphaël Berbain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [I tried to post this once already a couple of days ago & didn't see
> > > appear on the list - apologies if it ends up as a double post.]
>
> > > Hi Charlie,
>
> > > Inhttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-maven/issues/detail?id=149#c4, you
> > > write you planned to include the patch in the next release. svn trunk
> > > seems to disagree. Could you clarify issue 149 (& associated patch)
> > > status?
>
> > > thanks in advance & for your work,
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"gwt-maven" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
