issue 149 now features a sample that demonstrate the issue.
On Nov 12, 7:02 pm, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not in the trunk yet, no. I do think it will get applied to a
> future release, but exactly when I can't say.
>
> I was actually waiting on what the last comment says " I will check
> that sample and see if I can adjust it or create a new
> sample." I would like to see a small sample that demonstrates this so
> I can understand it better, and so we have a reference to check
> changes against going forward.
>
> On Nov 12, 5:40 am, Raphaël Berbain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [I tried to post this once already a couple of days ago & didn't see
> > appear on the list - apologies if it ends up as a double post.]
>
> > Hi Charlie,
>
> > Inhttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-maven/issues/detail?id=149#c4, you
> > write you planned to include the patch in the next release. svn trunk
> > seems to disagree. Could you clarify issue 149 (& associated patch)
> > status?
>
> > thanks in advance & for your work,
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"gwt-maven" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
