Ok, I just had a chance to look at the changes in trunk this morning
(RC-1).  Looks like we already have some basic 1.6 support, if we can
polish that and it DOES NOT affect the 1.5 usage then we can certainly
keep it, doesn't hurt. I don't want to add any more new features
though.  I don't yet know how deep the 1.6 stuff goes (does it just
use current structure with 1.6 GWT jars, or does it require/support
new structure, does it work with Jetty, etc?) but let's discuss before
we add anything else - I don't want to get into a big amount of
support and documentation here (new stuff should go to Codehaus/
Mojo).

Excellent work on the trunk though, looks great. I might have a few
questions that I will shoot you an email about (Cooper), but it's
working on all my testing thus far.




On Mar 30, 9:37 am, Charlie Collins <[email protected]> wrote:
> "2. The gwt-maven:gwt and gwt-maven:debug goals have moved to phase
> "install"
> where they should have been all along. If you don't want the compile
> step or
> the test step to run, use:
> mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dgoogle.webtoolkit.compileSkip=true
> gwt-maven:gwt "
>
> I have a couple of questions/issues with this.
>
> 1. The gwt and debug goals have been moved into and out of the
> "install" phase several times, we last decided on the group here (if I
> recall correctly) to keep them out of that for speed of the shell. I
> know about compileSkip, but I think the STANDARD usage should be that
> the GWTCompiler is not involved in just running the shell, no?
> Anyway, maybe I don't get it, what's the advantage to having it in the
> install phase and skipping the compilation - why is that the "should
> have been" way?
>
> 2. If we added support for maven.test.skip I am going to remove it.
> This is an ancient deprecated option from Maven 1 time frame. Surefire
> supports it, yes, but they recommend you don't use it. Also, we have
> our own test skip parameter testSkip (http://gwt-maven.googlecode.com/
> svn/docs/maven-googlewebtoolkit2-plugin/test-mojo.html#testSkip) that
> should be used to skip GWT tests. We need a different option than any
> the surefire plugin supports so that we can allow finer grained
> control, e.g., run the GWT tests but NOT the surefire tests, or run
> the surefire tests but NOT the GWT tests.  The options we already had
> should suffice for that.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gwt-maven" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to