We don't support those, because they aren't our parameters, they are
Surefire params.

We don't subvert them either, they still work just fine, it's just
that they pertain to SUREFIRE, not GWT-Maven.

If you want to skip GWT-Maven based testing support for GWTTestCase
tests use the param "testSkip" in config, or -
Dgoogle.webtoolkit.testSkip=true" at the command line. (And, as I said
there, the reason one plugin doesn't adopt another plugins options are
so that they don't shadow each other, I frequently want to skip either
the GWT tests, or the Surefire tests, and not both.)

On Mar 30, 11:07 am, Matt Raible <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Charlie Collins
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "2. The gwt-maven:gwt and gwt-maven:debug goals have moved to phase
> > "install"
> > where they should have been all along. If you don't want the compile
> > step or
> > the test step to run, use:
> > mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dgoogle.webtoolkit.compileSkip=true
> > gwt-maven:gwt "
>
> > I have a couple of questions/issues with this.
>
> > 1. The gwt and debug goals have been moved into and out of the
> > "install" phase several times, we last decided on the group here (if I
> > recall correctly) to keep them out of that for speed of the shell. I
> > know about compileSkip, but I think the STANDARD usage should be that
> > the GWTCompiler is not involved in just running the shell, no?
> > Anyway, maybe I don't get it, what's the advantage to having it in the
> > install phase and skipping the compilation - why is that the "should
> > have been" way?
>
> > 2. If we added support for maven.test.skip I am going to remove it.
> > This is an ancient deprecated option from Maven 1 time frame. Surefire
> > supports it, yes, but they recommend you don't use it. Also, we have
> > our own test skip parameter testSkip (http://gwt-maven.googlecode.com/
> > svn/docs/maven-googlewebtoolkit2-plugin/test-mojo.html#testSkip) that
> > should be used to skip GWT tests. We need a different option than any
> > the surefire plugin supports so that we can allow finer grained
> > control, e.g., run the GWT tests but NOT the surefire tests, or run
> > the surefire tests but NOT the GWT tests.  The options we already had
> > should suffice for that.
>
> I don't see the harm in supporting maven.test.skip. Also, they've recently
> added an additional (shorter) skipTests option. I use the following in my
> pom.xml to achieve "skip all tests" for both surefire and gwt-maven.
>
> <testSkip>${skipTests}</testSkip>
>
> Matt
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gwt-maven" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to