I'm working on a replica of the headress worn by Princess Charlotte in this 
Clouet painting (1522):
http://www.formfunction.org/temp/1522clouet-charlotte-de-fra.jpg
After much experimentation, I've come up with a pattern I'm reasonably happy 
with, but I just cannot make up my mind on a few points.  If you'll look at 
this closeup:
http://www.formfunction.org/temp/1522clouet-charlotte-detail.jpg
you should be able to see each of them.  

Issue 1: Those slashes
The closeup shows each slash with a sort of outline around it, as though each 
slash were bound with strips of the same fabric the hat's made of, sort of like 
a bound buttonhole.  It seems to me faintly unlikely that they'd go to this 
much trouble, and I certainly don't want to, but that's the only way I can 
think of to get that same exact look.  The only other options that come to mind 
are either a) just slash , and let it fray if it will--not too terrible an 
option, since the luscious heavy silk sateen I have for this is not at all 
prone to raveling drooldroolbragbrag--or, b) fold back a teeny hem for each 
slash, and stitch them into place.  Ideas? Suggestions?

Issue 2: What should the back look like? 
If you look at the bottom diagonal slash of the bag-like portion, on the other 
side of the circumference seam it looks a bit like there's a slash on the back 
that mirrors it.  Does anyone else see it?  I'm thinking I may just mirror 
those diagonal slashes around the edge of the back, and leave the center of the 
back plain, or perhaps decorate the center with pearls.  (Yes, I have a ton of 
glass pearls for the project.  This will be one heavy bit of headwear!)  I'd 
love any clever suggestions, though, as I haven't found any great backview 
shots of this style of headress yet.

Issue 3: that blackish semi-circle at the nape of the neck
This looks almost like a painter's mistake, or as though the paint has started 
to flake off to reveal a previous version, or some wierd aborted restoration 
attempt, or I don't know what; whatever it is, my instinct is that it's not 
really a part of the headwear.  If it were a part of the headwear, the only 
things I can think of would be a) a poor rendering of the bag's interior, seen 
in shadow (but I give Clouet way more credit than that!) or b) a netting of 
some sort.  Any ideas as to what on earth it could be?  Anyone know more about 
the history of this painting than I do (ie, more than nothing)?

-E House
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to