At 10:01 22/03/2007, you wrote:
I wonder if it (shoulder string) was something they did for children's
clothing, to allow for growth. She appears to be a young woman, could still
be growing?



This is similar to tying the straps of a corset to the front of the bodice. Any reason why this should not perform a similar job? She seems to have a fairly stiff bodice on.


Suzi


on 3/21/07 3:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> For 3 & 3/4 yd of 45" wide fabric, particularly in dark gold silk noil,
> consider this:
>
> http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/g/gentiles/orazio/luteplay.html
>
> I once did this out of two wool scraps that totaled about 2 1/2 yards (OK,
> they were 60 inches wide, but you've got much more than that). A bonus:
> cheap spun silks, similar to noil, would have been used for non-wealthy
> Italians in this period. And there's your color documented for you right
> in that painting.

I have never noticed the arm/shoulder treatment in that dress before. How
does it work, exactly? And why is it like that? It looks as if the front of
the bodice has a shoulder strap that connects to a string or cord of some
kind attached to the back of the dress.

Gail Finke

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to