Because the top of this is rounded, rather than flat, I'd go with a
padded roll/cushion kind of thing.

The wheel fathingales were also much larger in portion to the waist
than this one is, though it's bigger than a typical padded hip/bum
roll.  Maybe a transtional style?

The shape I'd go with would be a "c" shape for the waist with a larger
"C" for the outer edge with the distance at the sides about 6" inches
(15 cm) maybe a little larger in the back.  Thickness of the pad would
be what sits best on the hips to make the skirts stand out as
required.

hope this helps
alex

On 5/15/08, Leif og Bjarne Drews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have received some close up photos of the portrait i am going to make the 
> dress from, and i have uploaded to my webpage, mind the big files!
> http://www.my-drewscostumes.dk/br.htm
> Am i right to suggest that this could be a small wheelfarthingale?
> To me the angle of the bodice - skirt is nearly 90 degrees.
> Its not possible to see because of both hands covering the area, but i would 
> make a pleated frill on top of the wheel? Am i quite wrong with this, please 
> let me know what you think:
> Comments most welcome and greatly apreciated.
> Portrait painted in 1614 and Denmark was a little behind new fashions.
>
> Bjarne
> _______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>


-- 
"I'm buying this fabric/book now in case I have an emergency...you
know, having to suddenly make presents for everyone, sickness,flood,
injury, mosquito infestations, not enough silk in the house, it's
Friday..."  ;)
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to