I'm rather surprised because my solution to forms was the first to come back 
in response to the issue at hand and I've received no feedback on it. As a 
collector I KNOW anything like plastic, wood, etc is lethal for displaying old 
garments which is why the technique I use is good for short term because the 
form is covered with appropriate materials and sized/shaped to fit the garment 
prevent damage. 
Was only curious as to whether or not there was any interest in attempting my 
technique as it had not made the NEVER USE list. 
-Justine. 




-----Original Message-----
From: Schaeffer, Astrida <[email protected]>
To: Historical Costume <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, May 29, 2010 10:37 pm
Subject: Re: [h-cost] Preparing an exhibition of historical garments

 
 
 
Just a note-- most of the dummy suggestions given so far would be harmful to  
your 200 year old garments. Perfectly fine for short term display of modern  
stuff, but really not a good idea for clothing of historical merit. Please,  
please don't use them! I don't know how much you know about display, so please  
forgive me if I'm saying obvious things. And I'm not trying to stomp on 
anyone's  
suggestions or anything, but Ive been making museum-grade mannequins for over  
ten years and I've had to learn about this stuff! There's a lot to keep in mind 
 
and protecting your garment is as important as displaying it with the right  
silhouette, if not more so. 
 
Plastic forms from stores are likely questionable-- no idea what kind of 
plastic  
is involved, and are likely the wrong shape in any case and could have hard,  
sharp edges. 
Inflatable forms have sharp seams (bad) and would need padding out for  
protection. 
Duct tape is scary both because of the plastic that carries the adhesive and of 
 
course the adhesive itself. 
 
What you want are materials that won't outgas, like ethafoam (a kind of closed  
cell, carveable, chemically inert foam made by the company 3M). Styrofoam is  
actually safe but crumbly, you'd need to cover it in any case and it might not  
be structural enough. Urethane foams are a bad idea-- they outgas. You can use  
acid free mat board or museum grade plastic corrugated board to build up a form 
 
as well, again the key is acid-free and inert. No matter what rigid core you 
use  
for structural integrity and strength, your form will need to be padded so  
nothing rigid or sharp comes in contact with your textile, and you want padding 
 
materials that do not have starches in them (attract insects). Poly batting is  
good, so is needle-punched cotton. Polarfleece is great (use white though). You 
 
want to avoid nylon (polyester is safe), and anything that is dyed should be  
tested first to make sure dyes won't rub off on your historic garment. No 
matter  
what kind of dummy you wind up with, you a! 
 lways want a barrier between the dummy and the garment, something like  
stockinette. And you want the dummy to be fully supportive of the specific 
shape  
of your garment yet just a teensy bit too small so that no seams get strained.  
You want to be absolutely sure that the shoulders are not too broad for the  
garment-- modern forms tend to have this flaw, modern store mannequins are made 
 
to our modern aesthetic, which is much more built up and sporty than historic  
clothes can handle. And exposed wood should be sealed to prevent outgassing of  
acids (don't use polyurethane, paint is safer). 
 
Hope that helps, 
 
Astrida 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 
h-costume mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume 
 
 

  

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to