Are you using the default in memory tables for HSQLDB? (In which case its not a like for like comparison as your HSQLDB will have O(n) memory requirements).
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Brish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the H2 benchmark it looks like H2 is significantly faster than > HSQLDB. > > In the poleposition benchmark it looks like HSQLDB is significantly > faster then H2. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
