> Both H2 and HSQLDB support in-memory operation, the others do not. I > believe this scenario is not all that common. From what I know, most > people use persistent databases / tables. >
Isn't there a fundamental difference though? hsqldb in memory mode is still persistent, something which is not possible with h2, is it? So hsqldb retains that advantage, and jar size, even if it has not other advantages. - mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
