Hi, > When can we safely begin to distribute it on a larger scale (not beta)?
Not yet. I just found one important bug in the page store. It will not appear in the normal case, but I it's very important that this is fixed. I'm currently fixing it (and of course adding test cases). Originally the problem was reported by a user, and I could reproduce it now using a very small page size (64 bytes instead of the default 2 KB). > Is it more or less (or the same) subject to corruption? In theory, it should be less subject to corruption, because all old data pages are backed up before writing. The old storage engine only back up data, not indexes, by default (except when adding LOG=2). In the old storage engine re-built in the indexes, this will not be required; the new storage engine is simpler in a way. In practice, because the code is relatively new, the probability of bugs is higher. > Does the recover tools (very useful by the way with previous versions) work > as well? Sure. The recover tool should never be required of course. Regards, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=.
