Hi, Sorry for the delay.
By the way, about Lucene. Why H2 is asking for Lucene 2.2 and refuses > 2.4? Is 2.4 is any different that much? > No, I simply never tested with Lucene 2.4. > > Maven has some advantages, but: > > 2 - Building a project isn't always repeatable, > > I guess most current project can't be built in a few years. > Can you a little bit more input on "2"? Why is that > they will not be able to build later? I don't have any proof, but that's what I guess. Because you would need the exact same version of the JVM and Maven. I know there were problems because some Maven component relied on the specific iteration order of a hash map, but a hash map by definition doesn't have a defined iteration order... it's in the details really, and because there are so many moving parts the probability that things will break is very high. Is there any plans to make this build tool more sophisticated and as a > separate project? No, currently not. It seems most people are using Maven or Ant, and I simply don't have time to add all the missing features. Regards, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
