You're welcome to modify the code yourself and try out such things, but
in general we don't like adding complexity unless it makes a measurable
difference.
Regards, Noel.
On 2012-02-15 10:13, Wolfgang Pedot wrote:
Thanks for your input.
IMHO permanently reducing the number of idle threads can always be
beneficial (less work for OS, less stack-memory), for example
one could get rid of the log-threads by optionally supporting some
kind of log-interface to let the application handle the file-writing.
This way the application could also decide whether or not to keep all
the trace-files open all the time.
My trace-files are usually empty, so those threads do nothing but wait
for input 99.99% of the time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
