I understand and I´ll give it a shot. On 15 Feb., 10:30, Noel Grandin <[email protected]> wrote: > You're welcome to modify the code yourself and try out such things, but > in general we don't like adding complexity unless it makes a measurable > difference. > > Regards, Noel. > > On 2012-02-15 10:13, Wolfgang Pedot wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your input. > > > IMHO permanently reducing the number of idle threads can always be > > beneficial (less work for OS, less stack-memory), for example > > one could get rid of the log-threads by optionally supporting some > > kind of log-interface to let the application handle the file-writing. > > This way the application could also decide whether or not to keep all > > the trace-files open all the time. > > My trace-files are usually empty, so those threads do nothing but wait > > for input 99.99% of the time.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en.
