Aha, so the term "H2 License" refers to H2's dual-licensing, not to the modified MPL. I see, thanks for the clarification!
2013/8/30 Noel Grandin <[email protected]> > > On 2013-08-30 10:43, Lukas Eder wrote: > > 2013/8/30 Noel Grandin <[email protected]> > >> >> On 2013-08-30 10:31, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've accidentally stumbled upon an LGPL license header for >>> org.h2.jdbcx.JdbcConnectionPool: >>> >>> It's dual-licensed, so you get to choose the the license you want to >> use. >> >> > I understand, but given that all the rest of H2 is dual-licensed MPL > (modified) / EPL (unmodified), and given that users are free to choose > either one, wouldn't an LGPL-licensed artefact limit that choice of the > overall deliverable? > > I'm merely curious... > > > Actually I wrong, that file is actually triple licensed under MPL / EPL / > LGPL > > So it shouldn't limit your choice. You still get to choose MPL or EPL. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
