I also had problems with an mvstore db growing out of control (about 3GB 
for 1M rows). I updated to 1.4.184, reimported, and it was much smaller 
(100MB). 

So the recent changes have had a very positive effect. 

Unfortunately, I was using 1.4.178 because that was the current jar bundled 
with the jdbc-h2 ruby gem. That version doesn't seem like such a good 
default. 

On Monday, February 2, 2015 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-5, Damien Coraboeuf wrote:
>
> I have replaced by BLOB columns by BINARY(32000) ones (more than enough in 
> our case). After exporting the database in SQL ('script' command), 
> recreating a blank database and reimporting the SQL ('runscript'), I went 
> from 1.7 Gb to 17 Mb.
>
> I'll monitor the database in the next days to see if the inflation starts 
> again.
>
> Damien.
>
> On Monday, 2 February 2015 17:40:49 UTC+1, Damien Coraboeuf wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Speaking of real world example - we are using H2 1.4.x to hold results 
>> for a continuous delivery chain. With 1.4.177, our database was > 600 Mb, 
>> and after a 'shutdown defrag', we went down to... 11 Mb. We switched to 
>> 1.4.184 but now, the database has grown up to 1.7 Gb. That's a serious 
>> issue for us :(
>>
>> The URL we use is:
>>
>> jdbc:h2:/opt/ontrack/database/data;MODE=MYSQL
>>
>> Damien.
>>
>> On Monday, 5 January 2015 18:15:56 UTC+1, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> OK, that's nice! There is still quite a lot of room for improvements, 
>>> and I don't consider this completely fixed, but will not work on it with 
>>> very high priority any longer.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, December 21, 2014, Steve McLeod <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> The database file size in 1.4.184 is much, much better than in earlier 
>>>> 1.4.x releases.
>>>>
>>>> I've done some trials and these are my findings:
>>>>
>>>> 1.3.176: Fully loaded database after shutdown is 317 Mb
>>>> 1.4.184: Fully loaded database after shutdown is 380 Mb
>>>>
>>>> This seems reasonable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, 19 December 2014 17:15:29 UTC+8, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Version 1.4.184 should produce smaller database files than previous 
>>>>> version (1.4.x - 1.4.182), maybe half or a third of the old file size. It 
>>>>> would be great to get some real-world results!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Thomas Mueller <[email protected]
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some initial results: you can shrink the database by running 
>>>>>> "shutdown compact" or "shutdown defrag". Each time this is run, it 
>>>>>> shrinks 
>>>>>> a few MB (up to some point, of course). This works, but it's relatively 
>>>>>> slow. Now the task is to make it faster. There are two ways: shrink it 
>>>>>> fully to the minimum size, and shrink it incrementally (like now) but 
>>>>>> faster. I'm working on that now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Steve McLeod <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've sent you a private email with a link to the new database file, 
>>>>>>> made with H2 1.4.178
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday, 5 May 2014 07:46:16 UTC+2, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The database file should shrink if you run "shutdown defrag".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The current compact algorithm is quite inefficient, that means the 
>>>>>>>> databases file is quite big on average. The highest priority is still 
>>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>>> ensure it always works correctly, and when that's done I will work on 
>>>>>>>> more 
>>>>>>>> efficiently re-using disk space and specially compact the file faster 
>>>>>>>> when 
>>>>>>>> closing the database.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you send me the new database file? It would be nice to have a 
>>>>>>>> real-world database file to test this. The last file you sent helped a 
>>>>>>>> lot, 
>>>>>>>> thanks to it I found some problems that completely prevented the file 
>>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>>> shrink.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, May 4, 2014, Steve McLeod <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tested the same large data import with H2 1.4.178, and there is 
>>>>>>>>> no improvement over H2 1.4.177.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here are the file sizes, in both cases after the app has stopped:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> H2 1.3.176: pokercopilot.h2.db  301,669,352  bytes
>>>>>>>>> H2 1.4.178: pokercopilot.mv.db 1,023,037,440  bytes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let me know what I can do to help.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 19 April 2014 11:44:05 UTC+2, Steve McLeod wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Great! Glad I could help make your superb product even better.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 18 April 2014 21:38:27 UTC+2, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the database! I know what the problem is now, but 
>>>>>>>>> I couldn't fix it yet. The database file (pokercopilot2.mv.db) has 
>>>>>>>>> about 
>>>>>>>>> 181 MB of "live" data, the rest (about 78%) is not used. The 
>>>>>>>>> mechanism to 
>>>>>>>>> get rid of the unused space is not working as it should for this case 
>>>>>>>>> (I 
>>>>>>>>> think the problem is that b-tree nodes are not processed correctly). 
>>>>>>>>> This 
>>>>>>>>> will be fixed in the next release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Steve McLeod <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've sent a link to file privately to your email address.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 18 April 2014 14:04:37 UTC+2, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hm, that didn't help much. Could you send me the (compressed) 
>>>>>>>>> database files please? If it's too big, what is the compressed size 
>>>>>>>>> of the 
>>>>>>>>> files?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Steve McLeod <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried adding ";retention_time=1000" 
>>>>>>>>> to the URL, and this resulted in a small improvement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> pokercopilot.h2.db  302,018,560  bytes
>>>>>>>>> pokercopilot.mv.db 999,120,896  bytes
>>>>>>>>> pokercopilot.mv.db with RETENTION_TIME=1000:  811,728,896 bytes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> These numbers all reflect a loading of data in a newly created 
>>>>>>>>> database that consisted of roughly 2,400,000 INSERTS and UPDATES 
>>>>>>>>> with plenty of SELECTS and almost no DELETES. After the loading was 
>>>>>>>>> complete, I let the application keep running with the database open 
>>>>>>>>> for a 
>>>>>>>>> few minutes, then close the application and therefore the database.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is the full JDBC url I'm using:
>>>>>>>>> jdbc:h2:/Users/steve/Library/Application 
>>>>>>>>> Support/com.barbarysoftware.pokercopilot/database/pokercopil
>>>>>>>>> ot;DATABASE_EVENT_LISTENER='com.barbarysoftware.pokercopilot
>>>>>>>>> .database.DatabaseListener';COMPRESS_LOB=DEFLATE;CACHE_SIZE=65536;
>>>>>>>>> RETENTION_TIME=1000
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help diagnose 
>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 17 April 2014 17:15:50 UTC+2, Thomas Muel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "H2 Database" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "H2 Database" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "H2 Database" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 
Database" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to