On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 18:37, Andreas Reichel < andr...@manticore-projects.com> wrote:
> > So I wonder: should we not try to accept valid Uris at least for the > jdbc:h2:file: and jdbc:h2:nio: variants? > Would you consider PRs covering that? > > Sorry, but noo, a JDBC connection string is not a valid URI, and does not follow that syntax. We also don't need to make it's existing syntax any more complicated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/CAFYHVnUeteBVCyZ5fKDsnsBHbdJPeZum9aaSo-_aXVA04%2Bdc3A%40mail.gmail.com.
