On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 18:37, Andreas Reichel < [email protected]> wrote:
> > So I wonder: should we not try to accept valid Uris at least for the > jdbc:h2:file: and jdbc:h2:nio: variants? > Would you consider PRs covering that? > > Sorry, but noo, a JDBC connection string is not a valid URI, and does not follow that syntax. We also don't need to make it's existing syntax any more complicated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/CAFYHVnUeteBVCyZ5fKDsnsBHbdJPeZum9aaSo-_aXVA04%2Bdc3A%40mail.gmail.com.
