Hello. I think it would be better to implement UDTs from the SQL Standard instead of non-standard and not compatible with anything feature of another DBMS with esoteric syntax.
Contributions with non-standard operators most likely will be rejected, we don't want to have all this mess in H2. So the main question is what exactly do you want? Do you want to have full syntax compatibility with PostgreSQL or you simply want to have some representation of these values? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/bb76a074-355e-4928-8880-cd48a3852ef6n%40googlegroups.com.
