Btw, Are suncluster at sun.com and xen-interest at sun.com an internal lists?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Piotr Jasiukajtis<estseg at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ashu, > > Colorado Cluster works with OpenSolaris 2009.06 111b so I vote for it. > We need to get a quorum right? ;) > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Ashutosh > Tripathi<Ashutosh.Tripathi at sun.com> wrote: >> Hi Piotr, Eric, David, All, >> >> ? ? ? ?If i knew for sure, i would have mentioned that. >> >> The best i can do is to suggest that we retry this setup with >> nv110 or later. The Solaris VLAN tagging fix in b110 (CR 6797256) >> is likely to have improved the situation. >> >> ? ? ? ?David already has offered to try this out, hope he can >> accommodate this. >> >> ? ? ? ?As for the OHAC build which is known to work with b110 or later, >> i don't know what to suggest there, perhaps someone else on the alias does. >> >> Regards, >> -ashu >> >> >> Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> Related threads: >>> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=88314&tstart=150 >>> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=89150&tstart=135 >>> >>> Ask Ashutosh for more details. The problem is not fixed yet.. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Eric Bautsch<Eric.Bautsch at sun.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for find this. >>>> >>>> Since I don't follow ha-clusters-discuss and since I don't know what to >>>> look >>>> for in the archives there, can someone give me a hint what the issue is? >>>> >>>> Thanks again. >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>>> Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ashu, >>>> >>>> Indeed, I think it's the same issue.. >>>> >>>> Looks like I will try to give it a try with Colorado.. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Ashutosh >>>> Tripathi<Ashutosh.Tripathi at sun.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> ? ? ? Cross posting to ha-cluster-discuss. This sounds very >>>> similar to something which was already discussed on that alias. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -ashu >>>> >>>> >>>> Eric Bautsch wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi David. >>>> >>>> Here you go: >>>> root at phobos # dladm show-vnic >>>> LINK ? ? ? ? OVER ? ? ? ? SPEED ?MACADDRESS ? ? ? ?MACADDRTYPE >>>> VID >>>> xvm1_0 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:11:11:11 ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 >>>> xvm1_1 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:c:c0:74 ? fixed >>>> 403 >>>> xvm1_11 ? ? ?net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:33:6c:4e ?fixed >>>> 150 >>>> xvm1_10 ? ? ?net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:4f:98:bc ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 40 >>>> xvm1_2 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:c:4a:a6 ? fixed >>>> 404 >>>> xvm1_3 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:2f:d0:1f ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 >>>> xvm1_7 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:45:1e:e5 ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 >>>> xvm1_9 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:6d:9c:9e ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 33 >>>> xvm1_5 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:3b:6e:1e ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 33 >>>> xvm1_6 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:15:2:3 ? ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 40 >>>> xvm1_4 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:6:d8:ed ? fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 7 >>>> xvm1_8 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:1b:ee:67 ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 7 >>>> root at phobos # >>>> >>>> Note that the host phobos is running 117. I'm using 101a as the OS for >>>> the >>>> cluster nodes (the DomUs) because that's the latest version for which you >>>> can get clusterexpress. If I want something later, I need to use >>>> opensolaris >>>> instead.... >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>>> David Edmondson wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> * Eric.Bautsch at Sun.COM [2009-06-28 23:18:33] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yet another stupid question: I'm trying to build two paravirtualised >>>> Solaris Nevada (build 101a in this case) nodes on two different >>>> physical hosts. >>>> I then want to create a cluster between the two virtual nodes. From >>>> the following error message, I assume this isn't going to work: >>>> Jun 28 23:07:34 cressida.swangage.co.uk genunix: [ID 852664 >>>> kern.warning] WARNING: clcomm: failed to load driver module v404net - >>>> v404net paths will not come up. >>>> >>>> Note that v404net0 is one of the xnf interfaces which was originally >>>> created thus in virt-install: >>>> --network='bridge=net0,vlanid=404' >>>> (net0 is dladm create-aggr -P L2,L3 -l e1000g0 -l e1000g2 net0 ) >>>> >>>> and then re-named in the domU with: >>>> dladm rename-link xnf2 v404net0 >>>> >>>> Are we planning on making this work? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not sure that the xVM bits allowed you to specify the VLAN tag in >>>> build 101a. Please send the output of "dladm show-vnic" when the guest >>>> is running. >>>> >>>> dme. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> OpenSolaris <http://www.opensolaris.com/> >>>> ?Sun <http://www.sun.com/> >>>> *Eric A. Bautsch* >>>> BT Annuity Service >>>> Service Support Manager >>>> >>>> Email: >>>> *eric.bautsch at sun.com* <mailto:eric.bautsch at sun.com> >>>> Telephone: ? ? ? ? ? ? ?07710 495920 >>>> >>>> Team Mail: >>>> *ann-service-support at sun.com* <mailto:ann-service-support at sun.com> >>>> Team Web: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://btannuity.uk/servicesupport/ >>>> >>>> ? ? ? Sun <http://www.sun.com/solaris/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ha-clusters-discuss mailing list >>>> ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> Eric A. Bautsch >>>> BT Annuity Service >>>> Service Support Manager >>>> Email: >>>> eric.bautsch at sun.com >>>> Telephone: ? 07710 495920 >>>> Team Mail: >>>> ann-service-support at sun.com >>>> Team Web: ? http://btannuity.uk/servicesupport/ >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072 > http://estseg.blogspot.com > -- Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072 http://estseg.blogspot.com
