Yes, You should use Colorado Cluster in this setup: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/ha-clusters/announcements/#2009-06-01_Open_HA_Cluster_2009_06_available
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Eric Bautsch<Eric.Bautsch at sun.com> wrote: > I've tried build 111a which is the lowest build higher than 110 that I have > hanging around. > Unfortunately, there appear to be too many changes between build 101a and > 111a for clusterexpress to function: > v3.1.4-xvm chgset 'Mon Jun 22 23:27:07 2009 -0700 15914:89e9886c8ad7' > SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_111a 64-bit > Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc.? All rights reserved. > Use is subject to license terms. > Hostname: cressida > Configuring devices. > NIS domain name is cincin > /usr/cluster/bin/scdidadm:? Could not load DID instance list. > /usr/cluster/bin/scdidadm:? Cannot open > /etc/cluster/ccr/global/did_instances. > Booting as part of a cluster > name is non-existent for this module > for a list of valid names, use name '?' > NOTICE: CMM: Node cressida (nodeid = 1) with votecount = 1 added. > NOTICE: CMM: Node cressida: attempting to join cluster. > NOTICE: CMM: Cluster has reached quorum. > NOTICE: CMM: Node cressida (nodeid = 1) is up; new incarnation number = > 12466542 > 39. > NOTICE: CMM: Cluster members: cressida. > NOTICE: CMM: node reconfiguration #1 completed. > NOTICE: CMM: Node cressida: joined cluster. > > panic[cpu0]/thread=ffffff014bd05580: BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) > rp=ffffff > 0004d27c10 addr=0 occurred in module "sockfs" due to a NULL pointer > dereference > > clconfig: #pf Page fault > Bad kernel fault at addr=0x0 > pid=502, pc=0xfffffffff79dc9fb, sp=0xffffff0004d27d00, eflags=0x10246 > cr0: 8005003b<pg,wp,ne,et,ts,mp,pe> cr4: 660<xmme,fxsr,mce,pae> > cr2: 0 > ??????? rdi:??????????????? 2 rsi:??????????????? 2 rdx:??????????????? 0 > ??????? rcx:??????????????? 0? r8:??????????????? 0? r9: ffffff0152193ee6 > ??????? rax:??????????????? 0 rbx:??????????????? 2 rbp: ffffff0004d27d50 > ??????? r10:??????????????? a r11: ffffff0004d278a0 r12: ffffff014b1a8008 > ??????? r13:??????????????? 2 r14:??????????????? 0 r15:??????????????? 0 > ??????? fsb:??????????????? 0 gsb: fffffffffbc61930? ds:?????????????? 4b > ???????? es:?????????????? 4b? fs:??????????????? 0? gs:????????????? 1c3 > ??????? trp:??????????????? e err:??????????????? 2 rip: fffffffff79dc9fb > ???????? cs:???????????? e030 rfl:??????????? 10246 rsp: ffffff0004d27d00 > ???????? ss:???????????? e02b > > ffffff0004d27af0 unix:die+dd () > ffffff0004d27c00 unix:trap+1768 () > ffffff0004d27c10 unix:cmntrap+12f () > ffffff0004d27d50 sockfs:solookup+33 () > ffffff0004d27dc0 cl_comm:__1cGipconfOinitialize_int6M_i_+5a () > ffffff0004d27de0 cl_comm:__1cGipconfKinitialize6F_i_+29 () > ffffff0004d27e10 cl_comm:__1cDORBKinitialize6F_i_+585 () > ffffff0004d27e20 cl_comm:cl_orb_initialize+9 () > ffffff0004d27e70 cl_load:__1cIclconfig6Fipv_i_+167 () > ffffff0004d27e80 cl_comm:cladmin+13 () > ffffff0004d27ec0 genunix:cladm+a7 () > ffffff0004d27f10 unix:brand_sys_syscall32+1d0 () > > syncing file systems... done > dumping to /dev/zvol/dsk/rootdisk/dump, offset 65536, content: kernel > 100% done: 77277 pages dumped, compression ratio 3.79, dump succeeded > rebooting... > > Eric > > > > Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: > > Hi, > > Ok, I am going to test that in the near future. Has anyone created > similar setup already? > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Ashutosh > Tripathi<Ashutosh.Tripathi at sun.com> wrote: > > > Hi Piotr, Eric, David, All, > > ? ? ? ?If i knew for sure, i would have mentioned that. > > The best i can do is to suggest that we retry this setup with > nv110 or later. The Solaris VLAN tagging fix in b110 (CR 6797256) > is likely to have improved the situation. > > ? ? ? ?David already has offered to try this out, hope he can > accommodate this. > > ? ? ? ?As for the OHAC build which is known to work with b110 or later, > i don't know what to suggest there, perhaps someone else on the alias does. > > Regards, > -ashu > > > Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: > > > Hi Eric, > > Related threads: > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=88314&tstart=150 > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=89150&tstart=135 > > Ask Ashutosh for more details. The problem is not fixed yet.. > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Eric Bautsch<Eric.Bautsch at sun.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for find this. > > Since I don't follow ha-clusters-discuss and since I don't know what to > look > for in the archives there, can someone give me a hint what the issue is? > > Thanks again. > Eric > > > Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: > > Hi Ashu, > > Indeed, I think it's the same issue.. > > Looks like I will try to give it a try with Colorado.. > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Ashutosh > Tripathi<Ashutosh.Tripathi at sun.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > ? ? ? Cross posting to ha-cluster-discuss. This sounds very > similar to something which was already discussed on that alias. > > Regards, > -ashu > > > Eric Bautsch wrote: > > > Hi David. > > Here you go: > root at phobos # dladm show-vnic > LINK ? ? ? ? OVER ? ? ? ? SPEED ?MACADDRESS ? ? ? ?MACADDRTYPE > VID > xvm1_0 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:11:11:11 ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 > xvm1_1 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:c:c0:74 ? fixed > 403 > xvm1_11 ? ? ?net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:33:6c:4e ?fixed > 150 > xvm1_10 ? ? ?net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:4f:98:bc ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 40 > xvm1_2 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:c:4a:a6 ? fixed > 404 > xvm1_3 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:2f:d0:1f ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 > xvm1_7 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:45:1e:e5 ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 > xvm1_9 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:6d:9c:9e ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 33 > xvm1_5 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:3b:6e:1e ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 33 > xvm1_6 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:15:2:3 ? ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 40 > xvm1_4 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:6:d8:ed ? fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 7 > xvm1_8 ? ? ? net0 ? ? ? ? 100 ? ?0:16:3e:1b:ee:67 ?fixed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 7 > root at phobos # > > Note that the host phobos is running 117. I'm using 101a as the OS for > the > cluster nodes (the DomUs) because that's the latest version for which you > can get clusterexpress. If I want something later, I need to use > opensolaris > instead.... > > Eric > > > David Edmondson wrote: > > > * Eric.Bautsch at Sun.COM [2009-06-28 23:18:33] > > > > Yet another stupid question: I'm trying to build two paravirtualised > Solaris Nevada (build 101a in this case) nodes on two different > physical hosts. > I then want to create a cluster between the two virtual nodes. From > the following error message, I assume this isn't going to work: > Jun 28 23:07:34 cressida.swangage.co.uk genunix: [ID 852664 > kern.warning] WARNING: clcomm: failed to load driver module v404net - > v404net paths will not come up. > > Note that v404net0 is one of the xnf interfaces which was originally > created thus in virt-install: > --network='bridge=net0,vlanid=404' > (net0 is dladm create-aggr -P L2,L3 -l e1000g0 -l e1000g2 net0 ) > > and then re-named in the domU with: > dladm rename-link xnf2 v404net0 > > Are we planning on making this work? > > > > I'm not sure that the xVM bits allowed you to specify the VLAN tag in > build 101a. Please send the output of "dladm show-vnic" when the guest > is running. > > dme. > > > > -- > > OpenSolaris <http://www.opensolaris.com/> > ?Sun <http://www.sun.com/> > *Eric A. Bautsch* > BT Annuity Service > Service Support Manager > > Email: > *eric.bautsch at sun.com* <mailto:eric.bautsch at sun.com> > Telephone: ? ? ? ? ? ? ?07710 495920 > > Team Mail: > *ann-service-support at sun.com* <mailto:ann-service-support at sun.com> > Team Web: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://btannuity.uk/servicesupport/ > > ? ? ? Sun <http://www.sun.com/solaris/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > ha-clusters-discuss mailing list > ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss > > > > > > -- > > > Eric A. Bautsch > BT Annuity Service > Service Support Manager > Email: > eric.bautsch at sun.com > Telephone: ? 07710 495920 > Team Mail: > ann-service-support at sun.com > Team Web: ? http://btannuity.uk/servicesupport/ > > > > > > > -- > > > Eric?A.?Bautsch > BT?Annuity?Service > Service?Support?Manager > Email: > eric.bautsch at sun.com > Telephone: ? 07710?495920 > Team Mail: > ann-service-support at sun.com > Team Web: ? http://btannuity.uk/servicesupport/ -- Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072 http://estseg.blogspot.com
