Un...yeah, duh. I figured it was docs & L10n, but didn't have the 
context this time of package names being sent thru.

Sorry for the noise.  --emk

Jonathan Mellors wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> Ed McKnight wrote:
>> Jonathan,
>>
>> Could you explain a bit about the
>>    # Convert the external SVR4 packages into IPS packages
>> sections of Makefile.targ? I guess I never noticed this rule before 
>> now...
>
> You reviewed that change last month :-)
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ha-clusters-discuss/2009-March/002212.html
>  
>
>
> It just does a straight IPS import of each docs/l10n SVR4 package and 
> adds name, description and legacy entries. Plus it now adds the loose 
> package signature file.
>
> Jonathan
>
>>
>> thx,  --emk
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Mellors wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> As it's highly likely that some agents from Colorado will be 
>>> installed individually, instead of the using the group full 
>>> packages, we've decided to add loose package signature files to 
>>> those packages, so that scinstall can track them for removal and/or 
>>> upgrade in the future.
>>>
>>> Core:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jmellors/core-lpfiles/
>>>
>>> Agents:
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jmellors/ds-lpfiles/
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jonathan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
>>> ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss

Reply via email to