Guys, thanks for your feedback.

Well, maybe I'm so far simply misled by the idea that a cluster is best defined 
by its role and that a set of different roles will consequently lead to a set 
of interacting clusters. Just as it is also common practice to separate roles 
into DMZs (we also do this in the named setting).

So, would you suggest that I'd rather combine all roles into one cluster and 
use resource groups to map roles? But then, is it a good idea to spread a 
cluster over multiple DMZs?  I'm feeling a little uneasy weakening the 
separation I've introduced via DMZs by using a cluster.

What do you think? What is your best practice?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to