2010/3/17 Matthias Pf?tzner <Matthias.Pfuetzner at sun.com> > My guess: No! > > As this includes a kernel module, and as there might be changes between > builds, it is very likely, that these might fail... > > But, this is just my assumption.... > > Matthias > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Paul Armstrong <opensolaris at otoh.org> >> Gesendet: 17.3.'10, 19:26 >> >> >> Would it be possible to set the package requirements in the next >> ha-cluster code drop to be >= rather than =? >> >> That way if we want to try running on a newer release (e.g. B134 instead >> of 2009.06) we could. For example, I'm trying to setup an HA configuration >> with the integrated load balancer and a few others have mentioned things >> like the new CIFS code or COMSTAR improvements. >> > Any word if anyone is working on porting it to the 2010.3 release ?
With all the changes after Sun got acquired by Oracle, people are wondering if Oracle will still dedicate some of its developers to this project. -- Giovanni -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ha-clusters-discuss/attachments/20100317/b7b159cd/attachment.html>
