On Mar 17, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote: > 2010/3/17 Matthias Pf?tzner <Matthias.Pfuetzner at sun.com> > My guess: No! > > As this includes a kernel module, and as there might be changes between > builds, it is very likely, that these might fail... > > But, this is just my assumption.... > > Matthias > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Paul Armstrong <opensolaris at otoh.org> > Gesendet: 17.3.'10, 19:26 > > > Would it be possible to set the package requirements in the next ha-cluster > code drop to be >= rather than =? > > That way if we want to try running on a newer release (e.g. B134 instead of > 2009.06) we could. For example, I'm trying to setup an HA configuration with > the integrated load balancer and a few others have mentioned things like the > new CIFS code or COMSTAR improvements. > > Any word if anyone is working on porting it to the 2010.3 release ? > > With all the changes after Sun got acquired by Oracle, people are wondering > if Oracle will still dedicate some of its developers to this project. >
I am very interested in the answer to this question. I have a project where I want to use Open HA cluster on 2010.03 with Solaris 10 branded zones. If there won't be a 2010.03 compatible version of Open HA cluster, I better stop wasting my time. Jon > -- > Giovanni > _______________________________________________ > ha-clusters-discuss mailing list > ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss - _____/ _____/ / - Jonathan Loran - - - / / / IT Manager - - _____ / _____ / / Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley - / / / (510) 643-5146 jloran at ssl.berkeley.edu - ______/ ______/ ______/ AST:7731^29u18e3
